This is about something good happening -- holding Musk accountable a bit.
--KIM
**Minnesota lawmakers passed this ban 132-1 and 65-0 — as close to unanimous as it gets. Elon Musk's xAI waited three months, then sued three days before it took effect, asking a federal judge for an emergency block. The judge said no.**
A federal judge denied Elon Musk's AI company xAI's request to block Minnesota's first-in-the-nation law banning "nudification" technology — AI tools that generate fake nude or sexualized images of real, identifiable people without consent. U.S. District Judge Donovan Frank ruled the law can take effect as scheduled, finding that xAI's own timeline undercut its claim of urgent harm: the company waited nearly three months after Gov. Tim Walz signed the bill in May before suing on July 27, then asked for an emergency restraining order just three days before the law's effective date. "Such a delay in bringing the action and the motion suggests that harm is not immediate," Frank wrote.
The law, HF 1606, passed the Minnesota House 132-1 and the Senate 65-0 — near-total bipartisan agreement — and imposes civil penalties up to $500,000 per violation on companies whose tools let users generate nonconsensual intimate imagery of real people. It targets the platforms and developers directly, not just individual bad actors. xAI's lawsuit argues the law is an "overbroad, content-based ban" that sweeps up protected speech beyond its stated purpose; notably, the company's own court filings state it "does not contest Minnesota's interest in prohibiting the dissemination of artificially generated nude images of real people without their consent" — meaning xAI isn't defending the underlying practice, just challenging how broadly the statute is written. In response, xAI says it will restrict Grok Imagine's image-editing features for Minnesota users rather than risk the penalty exposure.
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, who defended the law in court, said simply: "Minnesota's landmark law banning the use of nudification technology will go into effect tomorrow as planned." Gov. Walz was more pointed on social media, addressing Musk directly: "See you in court, creep." A hearing on whether to grant a longer-term injunction is set for August 19, meaning this fight is far from over — but for now, the law stands.
Draw your own conclusions.
Sources: NBC News, UPI, CBS Minnesota, Valley News Live, KFGO
What you can do:
Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121 — ask your reps whether they support federal legislation modeled on Minnesota's law to hold AI platforms directly liable for nonconsensual intimate imagery tools
Find your representatives: congress.gov
Ask directly: does your rep support closing gaps in the federal DEFIANCE Act to match state-level accountability standards like Minnesota's?
Follow the August 19 preliminary injunction hearing for the next major development in this case
[there was a picture here}
This is simply the bare minimum of what AI needs to be held accountable for but yes no person or thing should be able to make …
See more
Reply
Share
Got to remember these folk are the Epstein billionaires they don’t care who gets hurt all they care about is money.
Reply
Share
Thank you Minnesota. I’ll bet you won’t find that happening in red states, they’d probably defend the muskrat like they do other pedos.
Reply
Share
Posts
