Tuesday, August 06, 2013

ANS -- The New York Times Endorses Plutocracy!

What do you think about cozying up to "the moneyed class"?  Is it an asset in a politician?  What planet do you think this is? 
Find it here:  http://billmoyers.com/category/what-matters-today/   
http://billmoyers.com/2013/08/06/the-new-york-times-endorses-plutocracy/#more-37222   is the full version.  I think.


The New York Times Endorses Plutocracy!

August 6, 2013
by David Sirota
This article first appeared on Salon.com.

New Jersey Senate President Stephen M. Sweeney listens, left, as Senate candidate Newark Mayor Cory Booker addresses a gathering of supporters at an event in Deptford Township, N.J. Tuesday, June 18, 2013. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

If you happened to have read The New York Times' opinion section this weekend, you may have noticed you were told that the U.S. Senate – the body comprised primarily of millionaires – apparently needs more lawmakers who are very close to the wealthy.

Yes, despite every member of the upper house raising huge amounts of campaign money primarily from the American aristocracy, and despite the fact that legalized bribery results in votes that consistently defend the aristocracy's economic interests at the expense of everyone else ­ the grey lady's editorial board implored voters to see Senate candidates' all-too-close relationship with America's uber-rich not as something suspicious or repugnant, but as something commendable and worthy of reward.

This was the powerful message in the Times' house editorial this weekend endorsing Newark Mayor Cory Booker's candidacy in New Jersey's upcoming special U.S. Senate election. Citing Booker's success engineering a $100 million donation to Newark schools from Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg (but conveniently not mentioning the ugly controversies surrounding the donation), the newspaper concluded its endorsement with a slap at Booker's opponents – one that in a single sentence revealed everything you need to know about the elite media's royalism (emphasis added):

Some of Mr. Booker's opponents are trying to denigrate those assets ­ his fame, his ability to work with Republicans, his coziness with the moneyed class.

You read that correctly: According to the Times, being "cozy with the moneyed class" should be seen by voters as an "asset" for an aspiring senator – one the Times insinuates shouldn't dare be "denigrated" by other candidates.

Of course, the Times is fairly accurate in declaring Booker as "cozy with the moneyed class." If anything, in fact, it's an understatement – Booker is one of Corporate America's most loyal and obedient Democratic politicians.

As the Republic Report and ThinkProgress both document, Booker's entire political career has been bankrolled by Wall Street. According to The Record newspaper, that includes his current U.S. Senate race, in which Booker "is tapping high-tech billionaires (and) Wall Street hedge-fund managers" to finance his campaign. Additionally, Booker has done something most politicians are too embarrassed to do because it is so blatantly unethical: whereas most politicians wait to retire before personally cashing in on their government service, Booker has personally pocketed massive speaking fees from corporations and interest groups while simultaneously holding a full-time public office.

This kind of financial investment in Booker would no doubt result in big legislative returns for the rich and corporations if he becomes a senator ­ just as those investments have already resulted in big returns for the "moneyed class" with Booker as prominent municipal politician.

For example, while raking in all this corporate money, Booker has been a driving force behind the national effort to privatize public schools ­ an effort that is making huge money for education profiteers. He also seemed to consider endorsing corporate-backed cuts to Social Security ­ until he was recently humiliated into backing down. But most notably of all, Booker used his political fame to publicly attack the Democratic Party's rhetorical criticism of Wall Street in the middle of the 2012 election.

That's right, last year Booker took to national television to slam President Obama for raising legitimate questions about Bain Capital's brand of Gordon Gekko-style vulture capitalism.

"It's nauseating to the American public," Booker thundered during an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press. "Enough is enough. Stop attacking private equity."

He then added that "from a very personal level I'm not about to sit here and indict private equity (because) they've done a lot to support businesses [and] to grow businesses."

Booker's statements ­ which omitted private equity's increasingly problematic record – generated nationwide headlines and dominated the news cycle for days. It was the kind of publicity that the aristocracy could only dream of ­ or simply buy outright. In fact, as my Salon colleague Steve Kornacki noted at the time, the latter is probably exactly what Booker's televised defense of Wall Street was all about. Booker had long before been bought, and he was most likely paying the investment back so as to guarantee even more corporate money for himself in the future.

Considering all that, you might expect an allegedly liberal editorial board in this Citizens United era to issue a scathing editorial denouncing Booker and endorsing one of his opponents with a more virtuous record. The fact that the opposite happened this weekend at one of the world's largest newspapers exposes a taboo truth: namely, that regardless of stated ideology on hot-button issues, the establishment press across the ideological spectrum almost universally accepts and/or lauds ­ rather than questions ­ the corrosive influence of money in politics. Indeed, even the ostensibly liberal New York Times editorial board doesn't view Booker's unseemly relationship with the "moneyed class" as any kind of liability – it openly views it and praises it as a cherished "asset."

Now, sure, Booker's version of pay-to-play corruption is old news, as is the elite media's typical deference to politicians who most steadfastly embody such legalized corruption. However, that deference usually expresses itself as positive puff pieces, softball questions and generally slanted coverage ­ and it is almost never just declared in crystal clear language.

That's what makes the Times' house editorial so important and such a critical historical marker in this new Gilded Age: beyond its endorsement of a particular corporatist candidate, it provides a rare example of the establishment press admitting to its plutocratic worldview.

In that worldview, voters are not supposed to see politicians' loyalty to corporations and the wealthy as the root of so many of the nation's problems. Instead, we are supposed to see a politician's unity with the "moneyed class" as an altogether desirable "asset" ­ no matter how much that so-called "asset" harms the country.

[] David Sirota is a nationally syndicated newspaper columnist, magazine journalist and the best-selling author of the books Hostile Takeover, The Uprising and Back to Our Future. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com


Anonymous said...

Мy family members every time say that Ι am wasting my time ɦere at net, but I know I am getting know-how everyday by reading sսch fastidious posts.

my web bloɡ :: To get Free Xƅox Live Codes Click Here (http://barbiedressupgamez.com)

Anonymous said...

Differences in religious observance frequently
cause misery in romantic relationships and often lead to an end relationships of people that otherwise might have lived
happily together. No more messing about and no plugging in and out your equipment
all the time. com and Expedia rooms up front at the wholesale rate and they are to pay back
the wholesale amount to them when they sell a room.

my page hardwell umf 2014

Anonymous said...

Hey, I think your blog mіght be Һaving browser compatibility
issues. Ԝhen I lоok at yߋur blog site in Chrome, it
loߋks fine but whеn оpening in Internet Explorer,
it has some overlapping. Ӏ juѕt wantеd
to give you a quick heads սp! Othеr then that, terrific blog!

my web blog - ebay affiliate account for sale

Anonymous said...

to your observance bar, opt for naturally fresh foods kind fruits
such as recliners or wagon-lit sofas. When you hold explored whatever of this section and you aren't
conformation true records, it's dubious that you do
not subject where you can tolerate an hold shopping justice present!
have introduce Coach Outlet Online Coach Purses Outlet Coach Factory Coach Factory Online Coach purses Outlet Coach Outlet Coach Outlet ne'er escape
your lav. One of their emails. You decide run the chance of
assumptive you record the conception that nearly intrinsic hemorrhoids
are antsy, respond scratch them. sharp them could discuss to cost and
different collection that everyone advent to your meat,
righteous equivalent exertion the muscles regular author.

Anonymous said...

These companies promise you to formulate well the structure
of a series of events or periods of time and loads of patience.
Don't pad your essay writing essay with unrelated information, visithttp://bit. This is different from those weak students.
Gathering evidence is used to assess people who have the entire concentration on your essays then you are taking to the sense of pressure.
Is the cost worth the product essay writing and you do not possess a complete idea.

In many of them so you can end up mislaying many of marks.

Feel free to surf to my web blog ... professional writers

John son said...

Debt settlement is reported to the credit bureaus as "account settled for less than the total balance" or "account settled". Keep in mind, nonetheless, that credit card accounts that have been settled appear positively on credit scores when compared to bad debt, or a failure. Your credit rating may decline initially, but just until the debts can be transferred from your credit account. It's important to remember, all the same, that your credit rating will improve due to the fact that one of the most important elements used when defining a credit score is the quantity of debt you actually owe.
Debt settlement attorney Massachusetts

Anonymous said...

I like it when individuals come together and share opinions.
Great website, stick with it!

Also visit my page :: Cheap Jordans 11

Anonymous said...

electronic cigarettes, e cig reviews, e cigarette, smokeless cigarettes, e cig, e cigarette forum

aris Munandar said...

Mobil Toyota Agya Terbaru
Agya Tipe E A/T
Mobil Toyota Agya
Mobil Agya
Mobil Honda New Jazz Terbaru
New Jazz RS M/T
Honda jazz S A/T
Honda jazz S M/T
Mobil Honda Freed Terbaru 2015
Mobil Honda Freed Terbaru
freed S A/T
Mobil Honda Freed
mobil new rush type g a/t luxury
mobil New alphard 3.5 type G A/T
Mobil new rush type G A/T
Mobil New Rush Type G A/T Luxury
Cewek Cantik