Monday, March 13, 2023

ANS -- Every Domestic Extremist Murder in 2022 Was Committed by Right-Wingers: Report

The title says it all.  Fascism rising.  
--Kim



Every Domestic Extremist Murder in 2022 Was Committed by Right-Wingers: Report

Since the January 6 attack on the Capitol, a "shedding of shame" has led to increased momentum for far-right violence.

By
 
Published
March 4, 2023
People pay their respects at a makeshift memorial across the street from Tops Friendly Market at Jefferson Avenue and Riley Street on May 18, 2022, in Buffalo, New York.KENT NISHIMURA / LOS ANGELES TIMES VIA GETTY IMAGES

Support justice-driven, accurate and transparent news — make a quick donation to Truthout today! 

Domestic extremists killed at least 25 people in the United States last year and all of them had ties to forms of right-wing extremism, including white supremacy, anti-government extremism and right-wing conspiracy theorists, according to a new report by the Anti-Defamation League.

Domestic extremist-related mass killings have increased in the past 12 years with most of them being tied to right-wing extremists, the ADL found. Researchers say the most concerning incidents are shootings inspired by white supremacist "accelerationist" propaganda urging such attacks.

"White supremacists who consider themselves accelerationist believe that there's no way they will ever be able to reform or change society to reflect what white supremacists want [and] the only option really is to actually destroy society and from the ashes, build a new white-dominated or white only society," said Mark Pitcavage, a senior research fellow at the ADL.

Due to this extremist belief, accelerationist white supremacists often encourage acts of violence, like shooting sprees that target minority communities so that they can destabilize or weaken groups they view as a threat, he added.

The report highlighted that while white supremacists have committed the greatest number of domestic extremist-related murders in most years, the percentage increased in 2022 – with 21 of the 25 murders being linked to white supremacists.

RELATED STORY

A medic carries out a back board as Oakland police and crime scene technicians investigate a mass shooting at the King Estates Complex school campus on Fontaine Street in East Oakland, California, on September 28, 2022.

2022 Was Worst Year for School Shootings "by Nearly Every Meaningful Measure"

The gruesome statistic is emblematic of a growing gun violence problem in the U.S.
By
 
February 14, 2023

This is primarily due to mass shootings. Almost all the killings in 2022 (93%) were committed with firearms, according to the report.

Five extremist-related murders were committed by members or associates of white supremacist prison gangs such as the Universal Aryan Brotherhood, the United Aryan Brotherhood or the Nazi Low Riders

"For many years while we were battling Islamic extremists… we took our eye off the ball on the domestic scene, in particular, white supremacists and neo-Nazis," said Heidi Beirich, co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism.

While these efforts shifted under the Obama administration, Beirich added, once Donald Trump took office, programs focused on combatting white supremacy and far-right extremism were undercut once again.

"He made light of white nationalism," Beirich said of the former president. "The government itself has essentially allowed this situation to metastasize regardless of the warnings."

One of the main factors motivating white supremacist violence is related to demographic change, Beirich said. This threatens extremists who worry that white Americans will become a minority by the 2040s.

When this prediction first came to light, the number of hate groups started to rise, she added. What made it even worse was when "the Trump era very much emboldened these actors, mainstreamed racism [and] bigotry against various populations [and] was rapidly anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim," Beirich said.

She added that "all of this was fuel for the fire for these groups."

The ADL report found that only a few of the 2022 extremist-related murders did not involve white supremacists, which included a QAnon adherent in Michigan who killed his wife, then died in a subsequent shootout with police.

Another incident involved a convicted Capitol riot defendant who reportedly killed a woman by crashing into her car in what authorities described as a suicide attempt by the person to avoid serving time in prison

The most serious of the non-white supremacist killings took place in Portland, Oregon, where Benjamin Jeffrey Smith allegedly opened fire on a group of left-wing activists gathering outside his home to go to a protest at a nearby park. He shot six people, killing one, before one of the activists was able to disable him with return fire.

Smith's online activity revealed extreme hostility towards individuals on the left and "communists," whom he claimed weren't human beings. In one post he said that "extreme violence" is the "only thing they give any attention to," and in another, he mentioned that "the only way to win a civil war, and we are in a civil war, is to be the most violent."

"In any extremist movement, only a minority of the people in said movement, ever actually engage in violence," Pitcavage said. "A lot of extremists have histories of domestic violence and sometimes extremists engage in domestic violence murders."

Some extremists can also engage in acts of terrorism, which could include anything from a bombing, mass shooting, assassination, kidnapping or a type of armed robbery that supports their cause Pitcavage added.

Only one of the murders in 2022 was committed by a right-wing anti-government extremist — the lowest number since 2017, the report found.

The two most serious incidents were deadly shooting sprees: the attack on Club Q, an LGBTQ+ bar in Colorado Springs in November 2022 and the attack on the Tops supermarket in Buffalo in May 2022.

Internal ideological factors, external ideological pressures, and stressors are influencing extremists to engage in acts of violence, Pitcavage pointed out.

Some extremists feel internal pressure from the way they interpret their ideology to commit violence while others are encouraged by their movements to commit violence.

Finally, external stressors are factors that are unrelated to the movement, but can have a major psychological impact on someone. This includes people who run into relationship problems, experience financial instability or lose their jobs, that are at risk of becoming unbalanced and resorting to violence as a result of being unable to process their frustrations.

"You really have to look at all the indicators that this accelerationist ideology has taken hold," said Jill Garvey, chief of staff at Western States Center. "When we look at all those indicators, like the number of plots that have been foiled, or how many people have been radicalized online, or how many different groups or networks pop up – like Proud Boys, Patriot Front, Oath Keepers and Boogaloo – that tells a very troubling story about how much bandwidth these ideologies have and that they are rooted in this idea that through violence, they can build political power."

The embrace of the accelerationist ideology has resulted in creating more acts of violence, Garvey said. People associated with this movement believe that through violence, they will be able to undermine democratic structures and build political support.

Social media has also played a key role in recruiting for these groups and pushing out ideas supported by these movements.

Pitcavage, who has been researching extremist-related murders, started compiling data on domestic extremists in 2008. He found that a majority of the recruitment from the alt-right started happening through social media. By 2010, social media was having "a very important effect on extremist movements because it allowed the spread and transmission of ideas, conspiracy theories to spread very far very quickly," he said.

To this day, Pitcavage added, social media allows the spread of conspiracy theories, disinformation and misinformation, which creates a space for different extremists to work together.

This has given way to newer movements that have formed in the last few years like QAnon and the Boogaloo movement.

What's changing with far-right extremist movements now is the "shedding of shame," Garvey said, referencing the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

"January 6 certainly was a sort of milestone in the far-right extremist narrative and actually from that point forward, I would say this form of extremism has increased, has gained more momentum," Garvey said.

Even if there were fewer domestic extremist-related killings in 2022 compared with previous years, violent extremism has become more prevalent, she added. "It doesn't actually point to the full picture of the harm or threat that may be present."

A QUICK MESSAGE BEFORE YOU KEEP READING

We're proud to publish real news 365 days of the year, completely free of charge to our readers. But producing high-quality, independent work is not cost-free – we rely heavily on your support.

If you found the piece above useful, informative, or inspiring, please consider supporting Truthout with a tax-deductible donation. A gift of any size makes a difference and helps keep this unique platform alive.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Tuesday, March 07, 2023

ANS -- Jessa Duggar Had An Abortion

This one doesn't have much new, but it explains the situation succinctly.  



--Kim


Mar 2

·
3 min read
·

Jessa Duggar Had An Abortion

Pro-life hypocrisy

Photo by Camylla Battani on Unsplash

Jessa Duggar, from the Duggar family who used to be on TLC, recently posted an emotional video about having a miscarriage.

Yahoo! News summarizes what happened:

Jessa documented in one scene on camera that she had been concerned early on in the pregnancy because she had been "spotting" blood.

The article goes on to say…

However, upon arriving at her next ultrasound appointment, the doctor broke the terrible news that the baby did not "look good."

Then the article says…

Due to risks of complications with passing the fetus at home, she said she decided to check in to a hospital to perform a dilation and curettage procedure to remove the fetus from her womb.

If you don't know what a dilation and curettage procedure is, it's a type of surgical abortion.

Jessa Duggar was going to have a miscarriage. There was no saving the baby. She wanted to be as safe as possible, so she had an abortion.

This wouldn't be newsworthy. This wouldn't matter because women go through this all the time. But it does matter because her family is 100% against abortions, calling them murders. They have been famous pro-life advocates for years.

It amazes me the number of pro-life people, who will preach their stance and harass others, and then go on to have abortions themselves.

Conservatives seem to think they're always the exception, that their reasons for doing things are better than other people's, so it doesn't count when they do them. They ignore the fact that many other women have miscarriages and need surgical abortions as well.

You may say that this doesn't count as an abortion because she was having a miscarriage. First of all, this isn't true. She'd had spotting, but hadn't actually miscarried yet.

Miscarriages are called spontaneous abortions in the medical world because the two are so closely related. Some people might say that abortions are a choice and miscarriages are not, but that's twisting the truth. Sometimes women make choices that lead their bodies to miscarry and sometimes women don't want abortions, sometimes they want to keep the baby, but things out of their control force them to get an abortion for the good of everyone — like in the case of Jessa Duggar.

Pro-life lawmakers never make exceptions for these things. They ban medications that could give people abortions, even if they have other medical purposes that they are used for as well. They also make getting surgical treatments like this difficult for many people to get, even if they already had a miscarriage.

Abortion procedures and medications are necessary healthcare for women, especially pregnant women who are already experiencing or might experience miscarriages soon. It saves the mother, by clearing out her uterus, and prevents her from dying of infections like sepsis.

Miscarriages are very common. Mayo Clinic says at least one in five pregnancies end in a miscarriage. This isn't a medical condition that can be ignored.

That's why I say that pro-lifers don't actually care about "saving babies." Their beliefs are rooted in misogyny. That's why they've already started arresting certain women because they had a miscarriage.

Pro-life isn't about protecting any life. It's about forcing all women to give birth and then punishing them if they don't do so successfully.

Most of the stories I write for Medium are behind a paywall. If you enjoyed this story and would like to read similar stories, please consider joining medium by clicking here: https://medium.com/@lilith.helstrom/membership

It will help me make a living as an author. Your support means the world to me!


Monday, March 06, 2023

ANS -- Facebook and Google are handing over user data to help police prosecute abortion seekers

Joyce found this article.  It's a bit long, but it's so scary you might not want to finish it anyway.  It's about your information being given to people hunting people who have had abortions to prosecute them.  At least read some of it.  



--Kim



Facebook and Google are handing over user data to help police prosecute abortion seekers

Mar 4, 2023, 7:08 PM
view over the shoulder of a police officer shining a flashlight onto a woman with hands covering herself, in front of google search history and facebook messenger chat screenshots mentioning abortion
Marianne Ayala/Insider
  • Police make requests for social media user data to aid prosecution after a crime has been committed.
  • Sometimes, the crime is abortion and social apps are turning over user chat logs and search history.
  • One legal expert said social platforms may cooperate with police even if not legally required to.

As abortion bans across the nation are implemented and enforced, law enforcement is turning to social media platforms to build cases to prosecute women seeking abortions or abortion-inducing medication – and online platforms like Google and Facebook are helping. 

This spring, a woman named Jessica Burgess and her daughter will stand trial in Nebraska for performing an illegal abortion — with a key piece of evidence provided by Meta, the parent company of Facebook. Burgess allegedly helped her daughter find and take pills that would induce an abortion. The teenage Burgess also faces charges for allegedly illegally disposing of the fetus' remains.

TechCrunch reported internal chat logs were provided to law enforcement officers by the social media company, which indicated the pair had discussed their plan to find the medication through the app. 

Meta said in a statement regarding the Nebraska incident that it responded to "valid legal warrants from local law enforcement" prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned nationwide abortion rights and allowed for bans in some states.

And though the warrants Meta responded to in this case "did not mention abortion" — since law enforcement had requested the chat logs while investigating the teen's disposal of the remains, which incidentally revealed the discussion of abortion pills — the subsequent charges reveal how data released by social media companies can be used to prosecute people for abortion, even when they are being investigated for other reasons.

Pharmacies sharing data

An investigation by ProPublica found online pharmacies that sell abortion medication such as mifepristone and misoprostol are sharing sensitive data, including users' web addresses, relative location, and search data, with Google and other third-party sites — which allows the data to be recoverable through law enforcement requests. 

ProPublica found similar web trackers that capture user data on the sites of at least nine online pharmacies that offer abortion pills by mail, including Abortion Ease, BestAbortionPill.com, PrivacyPillRX, PillsOnlineRX, Secure Abortion Pills, AbortionRx, Generic Abortion Pills, Abortion Privacy, and Online Abortion Pill Rx.

None of the pharmacies immediately responded to Insider's requests for comment.

Representatives for the FBI told Insider they were "unable to accommodate" Insider's detailed request for information about the criteria required for officers to issue a request for a civilian's social media or internet history, what information is generally turned over to them in the pursuit of such information, and what channels officers used to make those requests.

Representatives for Google and the Los Angeles and New York Police Departments, two of the largest police forces in the country, did not respond to Insider's requests for comment.

"We comply with government requests for user information only where we have a good-faith belief that the law requires us to do so," a spokesperson for Meta told Insider. "In addition, we assess whether a request is consistent with internationally recognized standards on human rights, including due process, privacy, free expression and the rule of law. When we do comply, we only produce information that is narrowly tailored to that request. If we determine that a request appears to be deficient or overly broad, we push back and will fight in court, if necessary. We do not provide governments with 'back doors' to people's information."

According to internal statistics provided by Meta, the company complies with government requests for user data more than 70% of the time and receives more than 400,000 requests per year. 

"Certainly, we expect that social media companies are gonna cooperate with law enforcement when they make legitimate information requests, we need them to do that," Eric Goldman, law professor at Santa Clara University School of Law and co-director of the school's High Tech Law Institute, told Insider. "But we also know that social media isn't likely to stand up to illegitimate law enforcement requests, because of the fact that they fear their own liability, or because of the fact that it's just too costly to stand up."

Goldman indicated examples where internet services affirmatively go to court to protect user interest, "but those are the exceptions." 

"There's thousands of requests for every one of those cases, and there's thousands of other decisions that the company made to just turn over the data because it's just easier quicker that way," Goldman said. "So law enforcement knows that they can make requests of social media, including court requests that do not comply with law, and expect to get most of them honored simply because that is the path of least resistance for the social media services."

No incentive to protect privacy 

While cases against people seeking abortions are increasingly being informed by user data provided by social media companies, those aren't the only prosecutions being built off of what people share online. 

Public social media posts can be used to build cases against people for major cases including child abuse and murder, as well as against less serious incidents that could have first amendment implications, such as jokesters who tweeted threats against airlines and memes interpreted by the DOJ as election interference.




Private content by users — such as location data or messages — requires law enforcement to obtain a warrant before it can be turned over. 

But "social media companies don't really have incentives to protect privacy," Sharon Docter, PhD, JD, and professor of legal issues and new media at California Lutheran University, told Insider. She said because the platforms themselves are unlikely to prioritize user privacy, the burden to do so falls on the individual user. 

"Users of social media need to be concerned about privacy, and that users really need to think through the fact that their digital footprint might potentially be available to law enforcement if there's a valid search warrant," Docter added. "And they should do all they can really to protect their privacy, by looking into sending encrypted messages, by making sure their location data is off, by engaging in any efforts that they can to understand the privacy policies of the platforms that they use." 

Expecting social media companies to change their policies or standardize encryption is unlikely, Docter and Goldman told Insider, since they aren't incentivized by law or user pressure to do so. However, overly broad requests made by the government are the key point of the problem, Goldman noted — not that social media is cooperating with law enforcement in the first place. 

"All the angst directed social media services for being a pawn in law enforcement's game seems misdirected to me. Social media is in fact a pawn in that game," Goldman told Insider, adding people often don't want to get mad at law enforcement or the government for overreaching and instead get angry at Facebook or Google for complying with sometimes illegal requests.

"We say 'law enforcement is just trying to do their job,' right, and 'if they get some wrong along the way, but they get the bad guys, you know, the ends justify the means,'" Goldman added. "It's so tempting to give benefit of the doubt to law enforcement, and that's why it's so hard for us to confront the reality: maybe there are times they don't deserve that benefit." 

Read next