Wednesday, June 08, 2022

ANS -- Some articles about the cutting edge of medical science.

Here's a couple of very short articles about what's coming up in medicine. Well, more than a couple....
I'll give you the first URL, then you follow the links at the side of the page.
--Kim


APR 7 / BY LONNIE LEE HOOD

SCIENTISTS SAY THEY MIGHT HAVE FOUND A WAY TO TREAT DIABETES WITHOUT INSULIN

IT WORKS IN ANIMALS, AND HUMANS TRIALS ARE COMING UP.

Getty Images/Futurism

Doctors may soon have a new way to treat type 2 diabetes, which affects millions of people in the US alone.

A new study published in the journal Nature Biomedical Engineering in late March used a special type of ultrasound called peripheral focused ultrasound stimulation (pFUS) and aimed it at test subjects' livers to see if it would lower blood sugar levels. The treatment worked in three animal species and wouldn't require additional prescription pills.

"Unfortunately, there are currently very few drugs that lower insulin levels," Raimund Herzog, a Yale endocrinologist who worked on the study said in a statement. "[This] would represent an exciting and entirely new addition to the current treatment options for our patients."

The project was led by a GE Research team and included researchers from multiple universities. One biomedical engineer at GE said human feasibility trials are on the horizon.

"We have shown that ultrasound can be used to prevent or reverse diabetes in these preclinical studies," Christopher Puleo said in a company press release.

If the tech makes it to market, it'll fill an urgent need. Insulin prices have shot through the roof, costing many people their lives when they aren't able to afford the medication anymore.

Recently, one legislator who voted against capping insulin prices said on Twitter that diabetic patients should just lose weight — even though people who are thin regularly get type 2 diabetes as well — in a grim intersection of fatphobia and outright misinformation.




In the face of that type of public health crisis, an alternative can't come soon enough.



9. 20. 21 / BY DAN ROBITZSKI

SCIENTISTS MAY HAVE DISCOVERED THE CAUSE OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

A MOUSE STUDY FOUND "LEAKAGE" OF TOXIC PROTEINS INTO THE BRAIN.

Getty / Futurism

For years, scientists have been studying how the buildup of toxic molecules in the brain might cause or contribute to Alzheimer's disease. But much more difficult has been figuring out what sets off the process that makes those molecules begin to accumulate in the first place.

Now, a team of researchers from Curtin University say that "leakage" of a toxic compound called beta-amyloid from the bloodstream might be the root problem, according to a mouse study published last week in the journal PLOS Biology. While it's not yet clear whether the same process happens in humans, the discovery could give scientists a new way to track or monitor the onset of Alzheimer's disease and, perhaps, help them develop new treatments to prevent it.

"While we previously knew that the hallmark feature of people living with Alzheimer's disease was the progressive accumulation of toxic protein deposits within the brain called beta-amyloid, researchers did not know where the amyloid originated from, or why it deposited in the brain," lead study author and Curtin researcher John Mamo said in a press release.

More specifically, the team found that beta-amyloid, a compound that builds up in the brains of people with Alzheimer's that's been long associated with the onset of dementia, is formed outside of the brain, then gets shuttled throughout the bloodstream by lipoproteins.

In the new study, the scientists discovered that those lipoproteins tend to leak, allowing the toxic compounds to reach the brain and start to accumulate. The mice that had higher levels of amyloid production also showed a greater degree of inflammation in the brain, hinting at a link between the compound and the onset of neurodegenerative disease.

"This 'blood-to-brain pathway' is significant because if we can manage the levels in blood of lipoprotein-amyloid and prevent their leakage into the brain, this opens up potential new treatments to prevent Alzheimer's disease and slow memory loss," Mamo added.

It would take confirming that the same link exists in humans before anyone can talk about new Alzheimer's treatments. But Mamo suggests in the press release that specific drugs or even changes to one's diet could reduce the amount of amyloid in the bloodstream, potentially helping to prevent or at least delay Alzheimer's — and that's big news in the fight against a particularly horrible disease.


11. 29. 21 / BY NOOR AL-SIBAI

SCIENTISTS MAY HAVE FOUND THE MOLECULAR-LEVEL CAUSE FOR ALZHEIMER'S

THIS COULD BE BIG.

Getty Images

Researchers may have found the molecular-level cause for Alzheimer's disease by looking deeper into the DNA tangles in the brains of dementia patients.

New research by scientists at the University of California — Riverside indicate that the key to understanding Alzheimer's may lie in the "tau" proteins that make up these tangles, found in the brain of patients with dementia.

Doctors generally determine that a patient has Alzheimer's or dementia if they find both brain plaques and tangles inside grey matter cells. But studies suggesting that one-fifth of people with brain plaques do not experience dementia led the UCR researchers to take a closer look at the understudied tau protein in an attempt to understand why it tangles and deposits the way it does.

Explaining the study, UCR Chemistry Professor Ryan Julian compared isomers, or different ways a single molecule and be shaped, to human hands.

"Hands are isomers of each other, mirror images but not exact copies," Julian said. "Isomers can actually have a handedness."

While the proteins inside the DNA of living organisms are normally made up completely of "left-handed" amino acids, the tau proteins found in dementia patients were "right-handed," which is unusual. What's more, the tau proteins of the brain samples UCR studied — donated by people who had plaque buildups but no dementia symptoms — were only left-handed.

"If you try to put a right-handed glove on your left hand, it doesn't work too well," Julian said. "It's a similar problem in biology; molecules don't work the way they're supposed to after a while because a left-handed glove can actually convert into a right-handed glove that doesn't fit."

This microscopic revelation could have huge implications for Alzheimer's research, as Professor Julian and his team prepare to study how and why the brains of dementia patients don't "clear out" the defective tau proteins as fast as usual.

And, just maybe, it could lead to new treatments for a devastating disease.

Read more: Scientists discover potential cause of Alzheimer's disease [University of California — Riverside]

More on Alzheimer's research: Scientists May Have Discovered the Cause of Alzheimer's Disease



 




MONDAY / BY NOOR AL-SIBAI

SCIENTISTS INTRIGUED BY TREATMENT THAT PUT EVERY SINGLE PATIENT'S CANCER INTO REMISSION

"I BELIEVE THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THIS HAS HAPPENED IN THE HISTORY OF CANCER."

Getty

Doctors working on an experimental cancer treatment were heartened when every single patient in a small trial went into remission, their cancer becoming undetectable.

Published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the paper that resulted from the trial details how all 12 patients who were given the experimental rectal cancer treatment went into remission without having chemotherapy.

"I believe," Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center scientist Luis Diaz Jr told the New York Times, "this is the first time this has happened in the history of cancer."

As an MSK press release about the study describes, study participants were treated to an incredible surprise when, after undergoing six months of the experimental immunotherapy treatment, they learned from their doctors that they were in remission.

The first patient, named Sascha, was preparing to travel to New York to have radiation therapy when she got the call from her oncologist, Andrea Cercek, who said the patient was "stunned and ecstatic" at the news.

"It's incredibly rewarding," Cercek said in the press release, "to get these happy tears and happy emails from the patients in this study who finish treatment and realize, 'Oh my God, I get to keep all my normal body functions that I feared I might lose to radiation or surgery.'"

The MSK doctors behind the study wanted to investigate whether immunotherapy alone could treat cancer, but they never expected it to work this well — and especially could not have foreseen that none of the 12 people in the initial trial had adverse reactions to the drug, known as dostarlimab.

Dostarlimab is a checkpoint inhibitor, which "releases the brake on an immune cell, freeing it to recognize and attack cancer cells," according to the team.

The finding is intriguing, but unlikely to represent a miracle cure. As the NYT cautioned, an average one in five people who take drugs like dostarlimab have an allergic reaction, and as many as 3 to 5 percent have severe reactions that include muscle weakness and trouble chewing and swallowing.

Dr. Alan Venook, a University of California, San Francisco colorectal cancer specialist who wasn't involved in the study, told the NYT that the lack of side effects means that "either they did not treat enough patients or, somehow, these cancers are just plain different."

Venook is not alone in his caution about the results. The trial was small, with only 12 participants, and has yet to be replicated.

In an editorial published in the New England Journal of Medicine in tandem with the initial study, Dr. Hanna Sanoff, a gastrointestinal medical oncologist at the University of North Carolina who was also not involved in the study, wrote that the "small but compelling" trial needs more time before doctors can fully understand the results.

"Very little is known," Sanoff wrote, "about the duration of time needed to find out whether a clinical complete response to dostarlimab equates to cure."

All the same, these unprecedented results are clearly pretty exciting for doctors and patients alike.

READ MORE: Rectal Cancer Disappears After Experimental Use of Immunotherapy [Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center]

More immunotherapy: Scientists Complete First Human Test of Vaccine Against Brain Cancer


Saturday, June 04, 2022

ANS -- Why We Need Planned Economies --We’re not getting thru all of these collapses without a plan

Here's another article about the coming collapse, not from umair.  I don't agree with everything she(?) says, but there's some good ideas in here.  And some good graphs.  Go look at the graphs at least.  

 

--Kim



May 23

·
9 min read
·

Why We Need Planned Economies

We're not getting thru all of these collapses without a plan

The Ninth Wave sailing, Shanghai, by Cai Guo-Qiang 蔡国强

The big argument against planned economies is that they don't work, but that's not true. The evidence is that they had shitty consumer products, but that ignores the value of public goods. Let's look at this argument and the evidence in turn, then let's look at the verdict that the Earth itself has pronounced.

If my examples from the NBA, New York rappers, and COVID-19 don't convince you that Capitalism is a planetary con, then just take the planet's temperature, or hell, take the temperature of millions of people dying of plague right now. Either we plan our way into this, or we're planning to fail. This isn't theoretical anymore.

The Argument: Planned Economies Don't Work

A 2011 paper by Cereseto and Waitzkin "compared capitalist and socialist countries in measures of the physical quality of life (PQL), taking into account the level of economic development." The results: "In 28 of 30 comparisons between countries at similar levels of economic development, socialist countries showed more favorable PQL outcomes."

Economic Development, Political-Economic System, and the Physical Quality of Life, Shirley Cereseto and Howard Waitzkin

To some degree this is obvious. Socialist countries invest in more social outcomes (public goods) while Capitalist countries invest in more capitalist ones (private goods). You get what you pay for.

To a tragic degree, however, this isn't obvious, because public goods are boring and invisible whereas consumption is literally conspicuous. If a health system or public housing is working nobody notices, but if an expensive drug or baller house is created, everyone does. And so Capitalism looks like it works better, even though it sucks.

The NBA

For an example of this, let's look at the NBA. When Jerry West (the guy on the NBA logo) started playing, the NBA was only about 20% black. Now that he's a manager, the league has completely flipped. It's around 80% black. Looks like progress, right? Exactly. Looks like.

A Fair Game? Racial Bias and Repeated Interaction between NBA Coaches and Players, Letian Zhang

Now let's look at income gains for ordinary black families across the same time period. As Quartz said'The typical black household is now poorer than 90% of white households.' In the time that more black people were appearing on television screens, their income growth was being stolen behind the scenes. Looks can be deceiving.

Quartz

As Biggie said"Because the streets is a short stop, Either you're slingin' crack rock or you got a wicked jump shot." As Giovanni Ribisi said at the beginning of the cautionary tale Boiler Room, from a white guy's perspective (who listened to Biggie a lot):

I read this article a while back that said Microsoft employs more millionaire secretaries than any other company in the world. They took stock options over Christmas bonuses. It was a good move. I remember there was this photograph of one of the groundskeepers next to his Ferrari. It blew my mind.

You see like that and it just plants seeds. Makes you think it's possible, even easy. And then you turn on the TV and there's just more of it. The 87 million dollar lottery winner, that kid actor that just made 20 million on his last movie, that internet stock that shot through the roof. You could have made millions on it if you just got in early and that's exactly what I wanted to do. Get in.

Rappers

The 80s and 90s saw a lot of brilliant poets like Biggie, Nas, and Jay-Z come out of the public housing projects of New York, and they looked rich as shit. The public housing they came from, however, got worse. American public housing has just been gutted to make rich white people richer.

However, because we have such a perception bias given more black people in the media, the system looks like it works, and that people it fails just aren't trying hard enough. The people with wicked jump shots or who make it in the rap game are in our face, and everyone else is buried in statistics underfoot. Looks can be deceiving.

Capitalism

Capitalism is full of bullshit like this. America has some of the most advanced healthcare in the world, which is widely unavailable to its own citizens. Norwegians are proud of all their clean Teslas, while their economy runs on dirty oil. All across the White Empire—even in the 'good', social democratic parts—the system that makes them 'look' so good is a lie.

Using their cultural and media power, they have also retold history into a convincing arc that ends with them rightly at the top. Communism has already been tried and failed, socialism has already been tried at failed, and as Margaret Thatcher said 'there is no alternative' to Capitalism. But it's just not true. Both in terms of human needs and ultimately the planet.

As Jason Hickel said, summarizing a lot of research:

Socialist states had lower infant mortality, lower child death rate, longer life expectancy, better literacy, better secondary education, better food access, more doctors and nurses, and better physical quality of life.

This research confirmed earlier results published by Amartya Sen. Sen found that in the global South, socialist countries tended to perform better in terms of social outcomes than capitalist countries. Building on these findings, Sen went on to spend his career arguing that democratically controlled public provisioning systems, entitlement guarantees, and state-led industrial policy are central to good development strategy, and should be prioritized.

These findings were supported again by the Spanish public health academic Vicente Navarro"Contrary to dominant ideology, socialism and socialist forces have, for the most part, been better able than capitalism and capitalist forces to improve health."

In this long year of our Lord COVID-19, I think we've all seen that this is true. Socialist countries like China and Vietnam fought off COVID much better. Meanwhile, Capitalist countries just let people die 'for the economy' and monopolized mRNA vaccine production for private profit.

They made a big show about developing miracle vaccines quickly, but then blocked global production to the point that the virus is evading them. This is great for profit because people have to keep buying these drugs forever now, but is it good for humanity? Fuck no.

It's just another triumph of the marketing of Capitalism over the results of what unconstrained markets actually deliver. The truth is that markets within socialism are very powerful, but social services within markets just benefit the rich and powerful. As plenty of research shows.

But research is fucking boring, right? Instead of reading reports, you can just turn on the TV and see Capitalism working great. Oprah's hiding cars under the audience's chairs, black people are dominating sports, musicians are rapping their way up. But it's all marketing, as much as the ads in between.

If there's one thing capitalism produces well, it's big TV sets and big stars to shine on them. But most people can't afford a house to put the TV in, they can't breathe the air without dying, and the whole planet is burning. Behind every bull market is a mound of bullshit, and the stench is finally becoming too much.

Ignition of "The Bund Without Us", by Cai Guo-Qiang 蔡国强

The Evidence: Consumer Goods

The general evidence for the superiority of Capitalism is all the stuff. And this is true, the malls and supermarkets are full of stuff. Francis Fukuyama famously declared 'the end of history' at this point, saying, "We might summarize the content of the universal homogenous state as liberal democracy in the political sphere combined with easy access to VCRs and stereos in the economic."

But just look at which products. Private, non-essential goods become available, but public goods become almost unattainable. You can watch a better life on a bigger TV, but your own life increasingly sucks.

Mark J. Perry, American Enterprise Institute

As Mark J. Perry shows, the costs of the things you really need—like housing, healthcare, and education—have skyrocketed, while the stuff you don't (like toys and TVs) is widely available. The masses have access to every possible opiate and very little sustenance.

In America buying a home is simply impossible for most young people, raising children is implausible, education leads to debt peonage, and any health problem courts total destruction. This suffering all shows up as profit on someone else's balance sheet, so a line goes up, but their lives are going down. Quite literally, as Matt Stoller discusses:

Given that we all live in or are actively attacked by the White Empire with America as its capital, this affects all of us. Fukuyama was right to talk about the end of history. Too many of us really put socialism/communism in the dustbin, because Capitalism seemed to work miracles here and now. Even as Capitalism leads to hell on Earth, we still can't imagine beyond it. What about all the stuff?

What does it profit a man to gain the world and lose his soul? In the end, you lose the world too.

Ignition of Spring, by Cai Guo-Qiang 蔡国强

The Verdict: Death

The wages of sin is death, and Capitalism is just the sin of greed elevated to a social virtue. While the Bible says death comes to every sinner in turn, the sin of Capitalism comes to every species on Earth all at once.

You cannot have rich people getting wildly richer and expect goodness to somehow trickle down. You just get the flood. You cannot light shit on fire and expect it to not get hot. You just burn the planet down. You cannot have endless growth against a finite planet. The planet just runs out.

While climate collapse isn't an extinction-level event for all of humanity, it is for quite enough of us. While this quarter might look good, in a quarter century even holy profits will run out. We will be abandoned by both Mammon and God, left to stew in our scarred coastlines forevermore.

Frankly, there is no way out, there is just a less painful way in. The truth is that we need socialist revolution all over the world and planned economies that balance human needs and the Earth. But nobody wants that, or at least not enough people. We like our stuff, and we won't give it up now. And so we delay taking action, until the climate takes action for us.

Climate adaptation within Capitalism is taking the same form as all the other bullshit changes we hear about. Now every ad talks about how climate-friendly their products are (like cars), but none talk about the need to degrowth and rebalancing with mostly public services (like buses). The market cannot even respond to a change like this except with ever more delusional marketing.

As the late Mark Fisher wrote"Climate change and the threat of resource-depletion are not being repressed so much as incorporated into advertising and marketing… environmental catastrophe features in late capitalist culture only as a kind of simulacra, its real implications for capitalism too traumatic to be assimilated into the system."




The fact is that controlled demolition of Capitalism now and the painful rebuilding of a planned economy over decades is the only rational way through, but we're taking the irrational route of uncontrolled demolition and dragging the whole process out. Instead of reckoning with ourselves, we're forcing the planet to reckon with us. The results are already mass extinction and a forever altered climate. Capitalism will just keep kicking the ball quarter to quarter, until we beggar the next thousand years of life on Earth.

If the argument against socialism is that it doesn't work, just look at how Capitalism is working out. People having shitty TVs is one problem, but the entire climate collapsing is a much bigger one. And that's where we are. We have the arguments, we have the evidence, and the verdict is being delivered, but we're just ignoring it all.

We either plan our way into this, or we're planning to fail. We have to plan economies for human needs, or else the Earth as we know it ends. The choice really is that stark. The traumatic implication is this. We cannot stop the fire and flood that are coming, but we can plan an Ark.