ANS -- correction to last post

Dear ANS group -- I apologize.  That last one I sent you, about Trump invading Venezuela, is worth reading, but it was not written by Heather Cox Richardson.  I don't know who wrote it, but it is very concerning.  The information I believe is correct.  We have heard about the invasion from several sources, and Joyce checked to make sure it's true.  It is. 

--Kim

ANS -- Heather Cox Richardson on Trump's Blatant act of War

Here is Heather Cox Richardson's summary of the outrageous act of war Trump just perpetrated.  Read it.

I have included the comments (if they come thru) so you can see how outraged we are about this. 

--Kim

Jo's Post

---

Heather Cox Richardson

Jo Dufo ·doptSnrose11401ccah5881fc0h66t41hf51892c4h7af0l5hah33u2934m0 ·

The Other 98% 

doptSnrose12401ccah5881fc0h66t41hf51892c4h7af0l5hah33u2934m0 ·

The U.S. just invaded Venezuela, bombed its capital, and seized its president — and they're pretending this is normal. In the early hours of January 3, 2026, the United States launched coordinated military strikes across Venezuela, including in Caracas and surrounding regions. President Nicolás Maduro and his wife were reportedly captured and flown out of the country by U.S. forces, according to President Trump.

This wasn't a "limited action" or some kind of border enforcement — this was a military invasion.

Explosions were heard throughout the Venezuelan capital and at key military installations. Smoke was seen rising from air bases and strategic sites. Venezuela's government immediately declared a state of emergency and condemned the attacks as "military aggression" that strikes at the very heart of its sovereignty.

Trump's own announcement on social media claimed the United States had "successfully carried out a large-scale strike against Venezuela and its leader," with details to come at a later press conference.

The operation was described as involving elite U.S. forces — including Delta Force — signaling this was not a quick raid on a criminal lab or a synchronized DOJ action, but a planned military assault.

Let's strip away the euphemisms: this is invasion, not enforcement. There was no imminent threat to American soil that justified the use of force under international law.

The U.N. Charter's Article 2(4) clearly forbids the use of force against another state's territorial integrity or political independence unless it's self-defense or authorized by the Security Council. There's no evidence either condition applied here — and global reactions reflect the shock and outrage.

The administration's own allies in Congress are already questioning the constitutional basis for this war and pointing out that they were lied to about regime change not being the agenda.

Make no mistake: the narrative that this was about "drug trafficking" or "narco-terrorism" was always a pretext. Trump's government had been building up military presence in the Caribbean for months under what's been called Operation Southern Spear, deploying aircraft carriers, troops, and designating Venezuelan institutions and gang networks as terrorist entities — a setup that conveniently paves the way for overt military intervention.

Venezuela sits on some of the largest proven oil reserves in the world, and its economic and geopolitical position has long made it a target of U.S. political and economic pressure.

This isn't a secret — it's been openly debated and speculated on by Venezuelan officials who say the U.S. wants control of their resources under the guise of law enforcement and "democracy promotion."

Now the gloves are off. A sitting president has been removed by force. A foreign government has been targeted without international sanction. A region already weary of U.S. intervention is watching this unfold with justified fear.

This isn't a "surgical strike," it's a regime change operation that tramples on international law, sets a dangerous precedent, and undermines every multilateral institution that's supposed to prevent exactly this kind of brazen imperialism.

We should not — we cannot — sit silent while the U.S. rewrites the rules of global engagement by bombing, kidnapping, and exporting its political will. Sovereignty, justice, and international norms matter — and it's time we demand accountability for a foreign policy that just crossed every line in the book.

Kim Cooper

Trump should be arrested immediately, and if the Supreme Court objects, arrest them too!

• 1m
• Reply
• Share

Richard Campanella

He can not continue to do this. Where the fuck is congress, why can they not stop this lawless attack on Venezuela, he must be stopped at once.

• 1h
• Reply
• Share

Lee Evans

Our military was warned not to follow illegal orders! Congress didn't declare war! Let's see appropriate legal action against our military!

• 1h
• Reply
• Share

Alice S Hoelzer

Totally insane! Makes him look like another Putin. And His lackeys in Congress will do nothing?????

• 1h
• Reply
• Share

Warren Otto Radke

Remove him! Jail him!

Who Voted for a Dictator!

• 2h
• Reply
• Share

Katherine Parran Moriarty

Top contributor

And he wanted the Nobel.

• 1h
• Reply
• Share

Charles Keisling  · 

Send Trump to CECOT

• 1h
• Reply
• Share

Joanne Russell

Angry, horrified (Canadian) and completely despairing.

• 1h
• Reply
• Share

Tom Baraniak

If we can remove another country's president, can another country remove ours?

• 50m
• Reply
• Share

Phil Van Ness

US Constitution Art 1, Sect. 8, Cl. 11. Read it and weep, patriots

• 1h
• Reply
• Share

Beth Ouimette

He needs to be stopped

• 1h
• Reply
• Share

Menno Homburg

We, the USA, are not like Russia!

We, the USA, do not invade and make war on other countries for made-up reasons like what Russia did against Ukraine!

• 1h
• Reply
• Share

Jim Kastritis

Without Congressional approval. Yes, we are now living the nightmare of a fascist state.

• 48m
• Reply
• Share

Janis Slater

Nothing he does is "normal" for a normal person. And it's getting worse day by day.

• 24m
• Reply
• Share

Karl Jones

Welcome to the new Vietnam.

• 51m
• Reply
• Share

Anonymous participant 336

• 1h
• Reply
• Share

William Pettit

"The U.N. Charter's Article 2(4) clearly forbids the use of force against another state's territorial integrity or political independence unless it's self-defense or authorized by the Security Council. There's no evidence either condition applied here — and global reactions reflect the shock and outrage." (Mara Lago better up the security. It's now OK to go after "individuals" in the government?)