Wednesday, May 31, 2023

ANS -- It’s Time to Krauthammer the Curriculum

Here's an article about trying to preserve the intellectual part of the Right, even if we have to do it ourselves (as leftists).  What do you think?  is it worth bothering with?



--Kim


It's Time to Krauthammer the Curriculum

By Chris Stirewalt

The Dispatch

April 04, 2023

What do we owe our adversaries in the battle of ideas?

We spend a lot of time thinking and talking about what is disqualifying in the discourse or debate of others—determining what is ugly, rude, bigoted, facile, sneering, hypocritical, etc.

We're all cancel culture commissars when it comes to our own little dachas. I know I am always ready to lay claim to a valid reason why I should not have to listen to this particular twaddle or respond to that obvious canard. Sloth is my shield against engagement with obvious rottenness. Who has the time or energy?

As we know too well, millions of Americans make time for it. And the more rotten, the better. My colleague David French coined the term "nutpicking" for the negative version of cherry picking in which the nuttiest nut from a political or cultural group is picked out by one of its adversaries to say that this is how allll Republicans, or Democrats, or Methodists, or people who make pie crust with vegetable shortening are.

This kind of fallacious part-to-whole argumentation isn't anything new, but social media has made nutpicking very lazy work indeed. A few minutes cruising the ranty holes of online argument will always yield someone calling for the death penalty for Crisco crustmakers or whatever suits one's immediate need for outrage. 

We've known about the human weakness for straw man arguments and similar sophistries since at least the time of Aristotle and the "defect of definition." But what about the obverse?

Five years ago, when my friend Charles Krauthammer announced that he had been diagnosed with terminal cancer and would soon be leaving us to sort life out without his help, Bret Stephens of the New York Times joined the river of mournful celebration of Dr. K's life and work. "Since I'm not aware of any precise antonym to the term 'straw man,'" Stephens wrote. "I hereby nominate the noun 'krauthammer' to serve the function."

And well it could. Charles wrote and argued without relying on disagreeable nuts to make his case for him, nor did he publicly revel (much) in the frequent flailing of his adversaries. Charles could often make the counterargument better than his opponent could and still dispatch it. He did this with good humor and his love for the absurd, but also through elevation. As Stephens put it, "by getting his readers to raise their sights above the parapets of momentary passion and parochial interest."

It is one of my core beliefs that no one has ever won an argument. If we define victory as changing the opinion of one's adversary, arguing doesn't just fail to convince, it actively pushes the other side away. Never has a person in an argument said, "Wait a second, that part you said about my ignorance and hypocrisy—I'd never seen it that way, friend-o. You've shown me that I really am obtuse and morally blinkered. I hereby agree with you."

But that doesn't mean we cannot persuade. And to persuade, we must first identify the shared values we have in common—to get our heads above those parapets. 

Jon Shields, a professor of government at Claremont McKenna College, has a bold suggestion for a way to "krauthammer" the worsening problem of the anti-intellectualism, indeed anti-idea-ism of the nationalist right in America.

In a thought-provoking op-ed in the New York Times, Shields argues that "every American university should offer a course on what is best in conservatism. That means teaching conservative intellectuals, not just the history of the G.O.P. or right-wing populism."




The overwhelmingly progressive-left slant of college faculties, especially at selective and elite institutions, means that right-of-center students have to look hard to find mentors and instruction. And very often, that comes in the areas of the shoddy argumentation useful for political organization, e.g. "own the libs," not in the rich, varied, nourishing world of political and moral philosophy. Turning Point USA and CPAC are no substitutes for David Hume and James Madison. 

Shields argues that the "squalid education" offered by these right-wing groups that fill the void created by the left-wing groupthink of the typical faculty and curriculum is itself a danger to academia. If the current trend among members of the nationalist right is to tear down the academy, what will the second or third generation of enthusiastic know-nothings be like? 

Left-leaning professors may not want to give conservative ideas any creedence at all, and some are no doubt afraid of the backlash that might follow if they tried. But trying to seal off higher education so completely has been a disaster.

"As late as the mid-1980s, about one-third of American professors were still right of center," Shields writes. "But by 1999, one survey found that Republicans accounted for just 2 percent of English professors, 0 percent of sociologists, 4 percent of historians and 8 percent of political scientists."

That's how you get Charlie Kirk but no Edmund Burke.

We owe our adversaries our best arguments, but also to make theirs for them. That even means instructing the next generation how to engage successfully in the battle of ideas.

Because it is through that battle, properly contested, that good ideas are discovered, tested, and preserved.


Monday, May 29, 2023

ANS -- The Right Is All Wrong About Masculinity

I found this NYT article on Facebook.  What do you think?  is he right about modern masculinity?
--Kim


The Right Is All Wrong About Masculinity
May 28, 2023
Josh Hawley raising his fist.
Josh Hawley gestures toward a crowd of Donald Trump supporters outside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.Credit...Francis Chung/Politico, via Associated Press

1.1K
David French
By David French
Opinion Columnist

There is a certain irony in discussions of masculinity. The group that is most convinced of a crisis of masculinity, the American right, is also busy emasculating itself before our eyes. It correctly perceives that young men are facing an identity crisis, yet it is modeling precisely the wrong response.
The release of the Missouri senator Josh Hawley's new book on manhood is the latest peg for a national conversation about men, but the necessity of such a conversation has been apparent for some time. If there's anything that's well established in American social science, it's that men are falling behind women in higher education, suffer disproportionately from drug overdoses and are far more likely to commit suicide.
Indeed, the very definition of "masculinity" is up for grabs. In 2019, the American Psychological Association published guidelines that took direct aim at what it called "traditional masculinity — marked by stoicism, competitiveness, dominance and aggression" — declaring it to be, "on the whole, harmful."
I strongly disagreed. Aside from "dominance," a concept with precious few virtuous uses, the other aspects of traditional masculinity the A.P.A. cited have important roles to play. Competitiveness, aggression and stoicism surely have their abuses, but they also can be indispensable in the right contexts. Thus, part of the challenge isn't so much rejecting those characteristics as it is channeling and shaping them for virtuous purposes.

I should note here that traditionally "masculine" virtues are not exclusively male. Women who successfully model these attributes are all around us. On my recent visit to Kyiv, I was struck by the restraint and courage of the men and women I met. In the face of the greatest of challenges, they exhibited a degree of calm conviction that's all too foreign to our domestic politics.
If you doubt the need for such stoicism in our own country, I'd point you, ironically enough, to the side of our political divide that is most critical of the A.P.A.'s conclusions: the American right. In its words, the right claims to uphold traditional masculinity; in its deeds, the story is very different.
Rudyard Kipling's famous poem "If—" is one of the purest distillations of restraint as a traditional manly virtue. It begins with the words "If you can keep your head when all about you / Are losing theirs and blaming it on you." The entire work speaks of the necessity of calmness and courage. Do not allow yourself to become too high or too low. ("If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster / And treat those two impostors just the same.") Persevere.
It's a compelling vision — although one that can become an emotional trap, to be sure. Stoicism carried to excess can become a dangerous form of emotional repression, a stifling of necessary feelings. But the fact that the patience and perseverance that mark stoicism can be taken too far is not to say that we should shun those values. In times of conflict and crisis, it is the calm man or woman who can see clearly.
Instead, the new right chooses to shriek about "groomers" on Twitter.
If you spend much time at all on right-wing social media — especially Twitter these days — or listening to right-wing news outlets, you'll be struck by the sheer hysteria of the rhetoric, the hair-on-fire sense of emergency that seems to dominate all discourse.

In 2016, for example, the single most important intellectual work of the new right was an essay by Michael Anton entitled "The Flight 93 Election." It began like this: "2016 is the Flight 93 election: Charge the cockpit or you die. You may die anyway. You — or the leader of your party — may make it into the cockpit and not know how to fly or land the plane. There are no guarantees. Except one: If you don't try, death is certain."
That's right: The argument was that electing Hillary Clinton, a thoroughly establishment Democrat, would mean the end of America. It's an argument that people never stopped making. In 2020, I debated the Christian author Eric Metaxas about whether Christians should support Donald Trump against Joe Biden. What did he argue? That Joe Biden could "genuinely destroy America forever."
Catastrophic rhetoric is omnipresent on the right. Let's go back to the "groomer" smear. It's a hallmark of right-wing rhetoric that if you disagree with the new right on any matter relating to sex or sexuality, you're not just wrong; you're a "groomer" or "soft on pedos." Did a senator vote to confirm Ketanji Brown Jackson for the Supreme Court? Then he's "pro-pedophile." Did you disagree with Florida's H.B. 1557, which restricted instruction on sexuality and gender identity? Then "you are probably a groomer."
But conservative catastrophism is only one part of the equation. The other is meanspirited pettiness. Traditional masculinity says that people should meet a challenge with a level head and firm convictions. Right-wing culture says that everything is an emergency, and is to be combated with relentless trolling and hyperbolic insults.
Twitter, even in its pre-Elon Musk state, seemed as if it had been constructed in a lab to contribute to a constant state of hysteria. Every single perceived left-wing outrage or excess is shared far and wide. "How can you be calm?" right-wing activists demand to know. "Didn't you see that the North Face is using drag queens in its ads?"
Last month, my friend Jonah Goldberg wrote an important piece cataloging the sheer pettiness of the young online right. "Everywhere I look these days," he wrote, "I see young conservatives believing they should behave like jerks." As Jonah noted, there are those who now believe it shows "courage and strength to be coarse or bigoted."
No one should think that this hysteria is confined to online spaces or that it ultimately remains merely petty or cruel. Hysteria plus cruelty is a recipe for violence. And that brings us back to Mr. Hawley. For all of its faults when taken to excess, the traditional masculinity of which he claims to be a champion would demand that he stand firm against a howling mob. Rather, he saluted it with a raised fist — and then ran from it when it got too close and too unruly.

If the right is going to claim it defends traditional masculinity — through its books, its viral Jordan Peterson videos and its Tucker Carlson documentaries — should it not at least attempt to exhibit the best virtues of traditional masculinity? Yet rather than model the traits of Kipling's "If—," the right mimics the attitudes of the countercultural 1968 film "If…," which offered a sardonic inversion of Kipling's virtues in its tale of a violent, schoolboy-led insurrection at a British boarding school.
I share many of the right's concerns about young men. As I argued in one of my first pieces for The Times, American men are in desperate need of virtuous purpose. I reject the idea that traditional masculinity, properly understood, is, "on the whole, harmful." I recognize that it can be abused, but it is good to confront life with a sense of proportion, with calm courage and conviction.
One of the best pieces of advice I've ever received reflects that wisdom. Early in my legal career, a retired federal judge read a brief that I'd drafted and admonished me to "write with regret, not outrage."
Outrage is cheap, he told me. And he doubted that I, as a young lawyer, had even begun to understand what true legal outrage looked like. Husband your anger, he told me. Have patience. Gain perspective. So then, when something truly is terrible, your outrage will mean something. It was the legal admonition against crying wolf.
I worry for the young right. As Jonah wrote, all too many of them "have no frame of reference, no meaningful political experience or memory of politics prior to this shabby era, they think being shabby is normal and smart." But there is a better way. It includes paying close attention to the very masculine values they claim to uphold, and it can start with remembering a singular admonition: "Keep your head when all about you / Are losing theirs." It's a step toward reason, a step away from the emotional brink and a key to understanding what it truly takes to be a good man.
Like
Comment
Share

Monday, May 22, 2023

Fwd: Tidbits



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Joyce Segal <joyceck10@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, May 22, 2023 at 7:23 AM
Subject: Tidbits
To: Kim Cooper <kimc0240@gmail.com>


Meta has been fined a record-breaking $1.3 billion by the European Union for transferring data belonging to Facebook's EU users to servers in the US. The fine is the largest ever levied under Europe's signature data privacy law, known as the General Data Protection Regulation. Meta's infringement is "very serious since it concerns transfers that are systematic, repetitive and continuous," said Andrea Jelinek, chair of the European Data Protection Board. Meta, which also owns WhatsApp and Instagram, said it would appeal the ruling, including the fine. There would be no immediate disruption to Facebook in Europe, the company said. 

--
Joyce Cooper
CEO SunSmartPower
650-430-6243
SunSmartPower.com

ANS -- Fascism Is Rising, But It Does Not Have to Be Our Future

Here is a fairly long article about the rise of fascism.  It's important stuff.  
Here's a sample:
"Organizers and activists must understand and monitor fascism because these movements are more easily stopped before they have time to make significant advances and increase violence. Fascist movements can grow, expand and take over political parties. Fascist movements can take over government functions and eliminate democratic processes, leading to authoritarian states. Fascist states espouse a militaristic, violent worldview, imprisoning and inflicting violence against their opponents. Fascism grows best when it is appeased or ignored, and history has shown that you can't negotiate with fascists — you must defeat them."



--Kim



Fascism Is Rising, But It Does Not Have to Be Our Future

Fascism won't be defeated with reactive organizing. We need long-term strategy.

By
 
Published
May 21, 2023
Anti-fascists, LGBTQ people and local residents oppose a far right protest against a Drag Queen Story Time event on April 29, 2023, in London, United Kingdom.MARK KERRISON / IN PICTURES / GETTY IMAGES

Truthout is a vital news source and a living history of political struggle. If you think our work is valuable, support us with a donation of any size.

Most organizers are exhausted, striving to balance the impossible load of community crises, family crises and urgent campaigns. Addressing long-term visionary campaign work can feel particularly challenging in these times of increased attacks from the right. Organizers are reeling within a political terrain where the left is working to preserve reproductive justice and bodily autonomy; address the criminalization and state violence against communities of color; navigate rising legal, political and interpersonal violence against Queer and Trans communities; address the increased violence, scapegoating and criminalization of immigrants; contend with the climate crisis; respond to the rise in mass shootings; care for communities still struggling from current COVID infections and long COVID, and so much more.

However, as leftist organizing becomes more defensive, the onslaught of attacks from the right keep increasing. It's critical for organizers to understand that these attacks are being fueled, supported and strategized by fascist movements. Organizers must know how fascism works to develop proactive organizing strategies before fascists utilize chaos, fear and violence to freeze leftists into submission.

Defining Fascism

Fascism is an ultranationalist, anti-democratic, far right movement. As author Shane Burley points out, fascism is a set of political practices fundamentally based in upholding rigid, identity-based hierarchies. These hierarchies manifest as forms of supremacy depending on the country and cultural context. For example, fascist movements can be white supremacist, nativist, male supremacist, Christian supremacist, and more. Under fascism, the majority sees itself as a victimized community that's fighting against marginalized communities for its survival. Within the U.S., fascists have convinced themselves that immigrants, Trans people, Black people, and many more marginalized communities are working to eradicate their way of life. In order to maintain their position, fascists believe in "purifying" society of the communities they see as undesirable to maintain the status of their conception of the "master race." Fascists believe that democracy has failed them and allowed the majority (in the U.S., white Christian men) to be tyrannized by communities that have no right to power. Therefore, fascists seek to eliminate both democratic processes and marginalized communities to return to an often fictitious and glorified past where their power reigned unchecked.

Scholars are currently tracking fascist movements in India, Hungary, Brazil, the Philippines, Russia and the U.S., among others. In each of these places, fascism has different qualities. What they have in common is that these movements seek to take over all aspects of public and private life and to eliminate people and communities who don't conform with their worldview.

Organizers and activists must understand and monitor fascism because these movements are more easily stopped before they have time to make significant advances and increase violence. Fascist movements can grow, expand and take over political parties. Fascist movements can take over government functions and eliminate democratic processes, leading to authoritarian states. Fascist states espouse a militaristic, violent worldview, imprisoning and inflicting violence against their opponents. Fascism grows best when it is appeased or ignored, and history has shown that you can't negotiate with fascists — you must defeat them.

RELATED STORY

Great Oak High School students leave campus in protest of the district's ban on "critical race theory" curriculum at Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park in Temecula, California, on December 16, 2022.

US Fascism Is Spreading Under the Guise of "Patriotic Education"

Republicans are rallying behind racist pedagogy as an organizing principle.
By
 
April 10, 2023

Fascism can be confusing and contradictory, utilizing ideology and practices that we see on the right and the left, including elements of mass mobilization and mass suppression, revolutionary fervor and hierarchical obedience, pseudo-science and mythology. It is often a contextual and reactionary movement that can be difficult to characterize ideologically. Robert Paxton, author of the "Five Stages of Fascism," points out that "there is no fascist manifesto," meaning that without a core text or definition, fascism can shapeshift based on location and cultural context. For these reasons, it can be exhausting to try and precisely define fascist ideology; instead, it's more helpful to focus on how fascist movements work — and the types of repressive political developments we can anticipate.

Fascist Movements Under Biden's Presidency

When Donald Trump's re-election campaign was defeated, many of us breathed a sigh of relief — not because we thought that Joe Biden's presidency would be progressive, but we felt that we would be more equipped to contend with a centrist Democrat than a far right fascist and authoritarian Republican. Right-wing researchers Steven Gardiner and Tarso Ramos have named Biden's presidency "a fascist interregnum": where they aren't seeing a rollback of fascist advances or an increasing and strengthening of democratic processes for all communities. Instead, we should view this moment as a pause, one that will not reduce the progress of fascist movements.

These political times can feed the growth and expansion of fascist movements. Fascists hate the political and cultural advancements of marginalized people, the language of equality, and representative political systems. George Jackson asserted that "the common feature of all instances of fascism is the opposition of … socialist revolution."When marginalized communities exercise power, it stirs up the anger and fear of fascists, motivates their organizing, and expands their base. Since fascism has risen historically in response to leftist advancements, we can predict rises in fascism as leftists progress toward liberatory goals. This is a dynamic that we should expect, anticipate and strategize around. Keeping fascists out of the presidency does not inherently protect us from fascism, because while the Democrats are holding some forms of state power, fascists are organizing to capture the minds, hearts and lives of their base. We must stay vigilant to the difference between fascist state capture and societal capture and recognize that they do not have to occur concurrently.

How Can We Track Fascists' Progress?

There are several indicators to help monitor the advancement of fascist movements:

  • Fascists use nationalist messaging to inspire and mobilize their base — particularly if it harkens to a glorified past.
  • Fascists work to grow and consolidate right-wing movements under their political frame.
  • Fascists create or take over existing political parties to increase their electoral powerand use these parties as tools for state capture.
  • Fascists move their talking points into policy, working to concretize hatred, fear and violence against marginalized communities, further enlivening their base.
  • Fascists work to control narrative, academic discourse in service of the "nation's" needs and criminalize or eliminate opposing perspectives.
  • Fascists remove, disempower or discredit democratic processes, including reducing voting rights and electoral power for marginalized communities.
  • Fascists consolidate their formal military power and normalize paramilitary organizations, resulting in increased incidents of violence against leftists and marginalized communities.

Several of these indicators are already occurring, and it's critical for leftists to be present with their progress.

Fascists have used nationalist messaging to inspire their base and increase power within Republican Party

The MAGA wing of the Republican Party exhibits many tendencies of fascist movements. "Make America Great Again" is a nationalist slogan in itself. The concept that the U.S. was previously great (and can be returned to this period) appeals to people who haven't historically experienced oppression, namely white Christian male citizens. Various studies characterize MAGA Republicans as those who believe that Biden is an illegitimate president, that "native-born" white people are being replaced by immigrants, and the "traditional American way of life is disappearing so fast that we may need force to save it." This movement is utilizing its messaging to consolidate and grow its power among the far right and exercise substantial power within the Republican Party as a whole. Even President Biden has said that the Republican party is "dominated by MAGA Republicans" and is increasingly beholden to their politics. Current studies measure MAGA Republicans as between 40 percent — 70 percent of the Republican party with an overall estimate that 50 million Americans identify with these messages and politics.

Fascists use their increased power to move their beliefs against Trans communities, abortion and immigration into policy

As this movement grows, proponents are moving their beliefs into anti-Trans, anti-abortion and anti-immigration legislation. Fascists adhere to strict gender roles, and particularly within the U.S.'s white nationalist fascism, patriarchal roles and viewpoints are a foundation of the mythic past they desire. Fascists are fighting to end the decline in their "way of life" and they see the disintegration of gender roles as part of the downfall of their "nation." LGBTQ, non-binary, Trans communities, and drag performers challenge rigid concepts of the gender binary in ways that fascists consider highly threatening. At the Conservative Political Action Conference in March, a prominent speaker declared that "Transgenderism must be eradicated from public life." Fascists are actively seeking to attack Trans communities, Queer communities, and drag performers to remove these communities from public life and increase violence against them. In 2023 alone, the ACLU tracked 482 anti-LGBTQ bills, ranging from reducing necessary health care for Trans people, limiting access to public accommodations including restrooms, banning conversations of LGBTQ issues in schools, limiting access to sports for Trans young people and banning drag performances. This dramatic increase in anti-LGBTQ (and particularly anti-Trans legislation) comes paired with increased threats against drag shows. According to GLAAD, there were 166 documented cases of threats against U.S. drag shows and events since 2022, including "increasingly violent rhetoric and incidents […] including armed white supremacists demonstrating" at and even attacking many venues across 47 states." Through these sentiments and policies, fascists whip their base into a frenzy of false victimhood to enact structural and interpersonal violence against an extremely oppressed community.

MAGA continues to operate as a fascist movement by working to eliminate abortion rights. Abortion is a form of bodily autonomy that directly challenges the centrality of the patriarchal family. Individuals do not have freedom over their bodies under fascism, particularly individuals who aren't cisgender men. Since the goal of reproduction in the fascist worldview is to continue the "master race," bodily autonomy and abortion challenge fascist belief systems. During his administration, Trump worked to assuage his fascist base by appointing far right justices, which resulted in the overturn of Roe v. Wade through the Dobbs decision. Since 2022, 13 states have completely banned abortions. The right has also increasingly criminalized traveling for abortions, self-managed abortions and assisting people to have abortions, creating a treacherous landscape.

Fascist movements have also moved their anti-immigrant agenda deeper into policy and practices. A 2022 study on American political views found that 50 percent of respondents believe that "native-born" white people are being replaced by immigrants." In 2012, the U.S. Census predicted that as of 2043 the country would no longer be majority white, and scholars named children of immigrants as the fastest-growing demographic. This accelerated fascist fears of the "great replacement theory," a conspiracy theory that immigrants and people of color are actively working to exterminate white people. The intertwining of demographic shifts and fascist beliefs have created a landscape for dramatic budget increases for immigration enforcement, the increased militarization at the border, reduced access to asylum for migrants, and dangerous and deadly conditions for migrants.

Fascists work to control academic discourse

Critical Race Theory (CRT) speaks to structural racism, and the role of racism as foundational to U.S. institutions. From 2021 to 2022, lawmakers introduced 563 measures against critical race theory, which included measures in all 50 states. These bans misapply the label of Critical Race Theory to a broad range of topics and consequently prohibit the teaching of race, racism, and white privilege. Fascist lawmakers misleadingly claim that these concepts disparage white people and indoctrinate young minds. These bills have been adopted 241 times. Attacking critical race theory aligns with fascist goals of asserting the U.S. as a country with a "master race," and removing and criminalizing all forms of thought that contradict this worldview.

Fascists work to remove, reduce and discredit electoral processes

One of the biggest examples of fascist challenges to electoral processes was the January 6 insurrection, when MAGA Republicans sought to disrupt the Electoral College certification of Biden's presidency through violently storming the Capitol. Additionally, The Guardian reports, between 2020 and 2022, fascist movements have worked to introduce "130 bills across 42 states that would increase law enforcement within the voting process." These bills have ranged from creating or expanding agencies to investigate "election crimes," to criminalize the turning in of absentee ballots for others, and increasing penalties for false voter registration." These actions, coupled with the fact that 37 million voters believe that the election was stolen, highlight disconcerting trends toward reducing the U.S. voting systems and power. The history of fascist movements' challenging of electoral processes is well documented. Robert Paxton, author of The Anatomy of Fascism, highlights the connection between Trump as a fascist leader, and also compares the January 6 insurrection to a pro-fascist riot in France. In 1934 groups of French veterans attempted to invade the French Parliament to stop the vote to confirm the elected government and instead elevate a fascist dictatorship modeled after Hitler and Mussolini's, a moment eerily similar to the January 6 insurrection.

Fascists normalize paramilitary organizations and incite political violence

The presidential debates in 2020 highlighted the normalization of fascist paramilitary power. When asked to disavow the Proud Boys, Trump defiantly stated, "Proud Boys, stand back and stand by! But I'll tell you what, somebody's got to do something about Antifa and the left." As named in their legal testimony, the Proud Boys believed this was a cue from Trump, and were later charged with seditious conspiracy, which requires prosecutors to prove that two or more people attempted to overthrow the government.

Whether it was the storming of Michigan's state capitol, also in 2020, or the January 6 insurrection, the MAGA movement believes in political violence, highlighting its fascistic practices. The power of these sentiments continues to grow at an alarming pace. Studies show that 50 percent of Americans believe that there will be an upcoming civil war in the U.S. and 30 percent of Republicans believe that violence is necessary to save the country. The recent Texas mass shootings and the Buffalo mass shooting in 2022 were perpetrated by followers of fascistic websites and organizations, highlighting a connection between these beliefs and gun violence.

How Do We Defeat Fascism?

"[Fascism is recognizable] by its terror of truly democratic agendas." — Toni Morrison

The United States' long history of white nationalist and white supremacist fascism has been intertwined within the U.S.'s articulation as a liberal democracy. Black, Indigenous and Communities of Color within the U.S. have often lived underneath a fascistic and supremacist state. Fascism scholars regularly cite the Cornerstone Speech as one of many examples of U.S. fascism. The vice president of the Confederacy gave this speech, claiming a need to ensure that their new principles of governance align with the principles of "nature in opposition to the Constitution":

Those ideas, (the constitution) however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the "storm came and the wind blew." Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests upon the great truth, that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery — subordination to the superior race — is his natural and normal condition.

Fascism remains embedded with U.S. politics; Italian fascism and German fascism took inspiration from the U.S.'s Jim Crow laws, and the KKK inspired many leaders within European fascism. The MAGA movement continues and enlivens the legacy of fascist beliefs that have always existed within this country.




Despite this history, fascism does not have to be the U.S.'s future. Our current trajectory is alarming, yet the increasing power of fascists can still be curtailed. Fascism produces and thrives on a culture of fear and chaos. Chaos can create conditions where it is almost impossible to focus on long-term strategy — yet long-term strategy is exactly what we need to win against fascists. The left's potential strategic pitfall is an overreliance on short-term, reactive organizing. The goal of fascists is to scare leftists into stopping a progressive agenda. Yet to truly defeat fascism we must create the opposite —movements that are so vibrant and relevant to everyday people that the allure of fascism is eliminated. Leftists need to focus on the strategies of creating liberatory governance where people have access to their needs, freedom within their bodies, and rights separate from societal hierarchies. This is what scares fascists the most — that the left will envision and execute a world that eliminates the hierarchies that they depend upon.

Fascism has been defeated multiple times in history. Fascists need to be out-organized through collaborations that often require broad alliances, typically among the left and center political forces. In these times where our movements are facing serious fractures, when many of the movement organizations are struggling to engage and align their internal strategy, it's important to remember that our survival is dependent on the strength of our organizing and our collaborations. As Shane Burley states, "Fascists' end game is not to rule the state, but to rule our lives." The foundation to the fascist thinking is that we are out to eliminate them, and we need to do just that.

The author would like to thank Shane Burley for offering his insight into fascism for this article.

​​BEHIND EVERY GREAT ARTICLE IS A JOURNALIST WORKING TIRELESSLY TO BRING YOU THE TRUTH.