this is good:
Sunday, May 03, 2026
ANS -- Pope Leo appoints immigrant as next bishop of West Virginia.
I found this on FaceBook, but when I tried to "share" it, they said it had been removed. the headline was a bit misleading -- they said he appointed an undocumented immigrant, but he was that long ago, but had since gotten "papers".....
I wasn't sure, so I asked Google, and this is what it said:
Based on reports from May 2026, it is true that Pope Leo XIV appointed Bishop Evelio Menjivar-Ayala—who entered the US as an undocumented immigrant from El Salvador as a teenager—to lead the Diocese of Wheeling-Charleston in West Virginia. This appointment has sparked debate, particularly among critics of the Pope's immigration views and supporters of stricter enforcement. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Key Details of the Appointment:
--Kim
BREAKING: WOW. Pope Leo enrages MAGA morons by appointing an undocumented immigrant as the next bishop for deep-red West Virginia!
In a second respectful and well-deserved major promotion announced on Friday, the Holy Father named Salvadoran immigrant Rev. Evelio Menijar-Ayala to be West Virginia’s lone Catholic bishop.
Menijar-Ayala arrived in the US as an undocumented immigrant at age 18 from El Salvador after being smuggled over the border in the trunk of a car.
He applied for and received asylum, a work permit, and later a green card, and worked his way up from a receptionist at a law firm up to later becoming a priest and now earning an appointment as bishop.
While he has certainly earned his promotion, it’s hard to see how this isn’t a politically symbolic appointment, considering Pope Leo’s fiery opposition to Donald Trump’s anti-immigrant racism and the number of Trump supporters in West Virginia.
“[Immigrants] are human beings, and we have to treat human beings in a humanitarian way and not treat them worse … than house pets or animals,” said the Pope in response to Trump's cruel deportation regime.
Now the Trump-loving Catholics of West Virginia must do some serious soul-searching and decide what’s more important to them: their relationship with God or their loyalty to Donald Trump.
Congratulations to Rev. Evelio Menijar-Ayala! He is a shining example of the joy and the good that immigrants bring to our country.
Friday, May 01, 2026
ANS -- This could eliminate future Pandemic threats
This is the kind of thing Trump has stopped funding for. Luckily for us, other countries are still doing medical research. And this is a very promising way to defeat Corona viruses.
--Kim
Six years after COVID-19 reshaped the world, scientists at the Francis Crick Institute in London have completed something that would have seemed impossible in 2020 — a comprehensive structural and functional map of every protein encoded by the coronavirus family, identifying the conserved vulnerability sites shared across all known variants and related bat coronaviruses likely to cause future spillovers. This isn't just about SARS-CoV-2. It's a blueprint for defeating the entire coronavirus family before the next pandemic begins. 
The project used cryo-electron microscopy and AlphaFold2 structural predictions to resolve the three-dimensional architecture of 29 coronavirus proteins across 15 distinct coronavirus species. By overlaying these structures and identifying regions that remain geometrically identical across all variants — conserved because mutations there destroy essential viral function — the team pinpointed seven "Achilles heel" sites that represent pan-coronavirus therapeutic targets. A drug or antibody targeting any of these sites would theoretically work against any coronavirus, past or future, regardless of how much the spike protein mutates.
For pandemic preparedness in 2026, this map is being used to accelerate broad-spectrum antiviral development through two parallel tracks. The first involves small molecule inhibitors targeting the most conserved viral protease sites. The second involves designing "pan-coronavirus antibodies" that bind the identified structural invariant regions — antibodies that wouldn't need updating with each new variant the way current vaccines do. 
The lesson COVID-19 taught the world at catastrophic cost was that reactive pandemic response is too slow. The Crick Institute's protein vulnerability atlas represents exactly the kind of proactive science that could prevent the next coronavirus from reaching pandemic scale.
Source: Francis Crick Institute, Nature, 2025 #Coronavirus #PandemicPreparedness #AntiviralDrug #PanCoronavirus #ViralStructure #FuturePandemic
Thursday, April 30, 2026
ANS -- After Roe Fell, Young Women Started Choosing Permanence
I don't know who wrote this, but it's intriguing. apparently, when abortion became illegal, women are deciding that they will just get sterilized and not have to worry about it. I checked and the information is true.
--Kim
After Roe fell, young women started choosing permanence. The numbers spiked everywhere. Even in blue states.
The waiting rooms feel different now. More crowded. Younger faces. And a request that used to be rare has become routine.
"I want my tubes tied. Permanently."
Across America, something unprecedented is happening. Since June 2022, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, requests for tubal ligation have surged among women in their twenties and early thirties.
Not women who've finished having children. Not women in their late thirties reconsidering family size.
Women with no children. No plans for children. Just certainty.
The numbers tell a story that anecdotes can't capture alone. Multiple peer-reviewed studies now document what doctors began noticing immediately after the Dobbs decision: permanent sterilization procedures among young adults jumped sharply and have continued climbing.
One study analyzing data from 113 million patients found tubal ligations increased by approximately 58 additional procedures per 100,000 outpatient visits after Dobbs. By August 2022—just two months after the decision—there were 799 more tubal sterilizations among 19-to-26-year-olds compared to May 2022. A 70% increase.
Another study tracking patients through September 2023 found tubal ligations among young adults had doubled in the sixteen months following the Supreme Court ruling.
Google searches mirrored the clinical reality. The week after the Dobbs opinion leaked in May 2022, searches for "tubal ligation" spiked 70%. Searches for "how to get my tubes tied" surged.
Dr. Gina Nelson, who's practiced obstetrics and gynecology in Kalispell, Montana, for 30 years, noticed the shift immediately. "The biggest change is among young patients who don't have children seeking sterilization," she told reporters. "That's a big shift from when I started practicing."
Dr. Clayton Alfonso at Duke University in North Carolina saw the same pattern. "Patients who didn't want more—or any—children were worried about contraceptives failing and becoming pregnant unexpectedly," he explained. They told him they'd rather be sterilized in case they weren't able to get an abortion.
But here's what makes the phenomenon even more striking: it's not just happening in states where abortion became illegal overnight.
The increases occurred everywhere.
Researchers categorized states into three groups: banned (abortion illegal or severely restricted), limited (significant restrictions but not total bans), and protected (abortion rights legally safeguarded).
After Dobbs, tubal ligation rates rose in all three categories.
States where abortion was banned saw the steepest sustained increases—about 3% each month. But protected states—places like California, New York, Massachusetts—also saw significant jumps.
Because the women making these decisions understand something fundamental: rights on paper can vanish with a single court decision.
Sophia Ferst lives in Montana with her wife, Madison Bethke. After Roe fell, Ferst—under 30 and childfree—decided to get sterilized. She's one of thousands.
"The future of abortion rights is deeply uncertain" in Montana, even though the state constitution currently protects reproductive rights. Ferst, like many young women, learned that constitutional protections aren't permanent.
This is about control in an era when control feels precarious.
It's not impulsive. Research shows these young women—the same age group most likely to seek abortions—are also the demographic most likely to experience sterilization regret later. They know the statistics. They're making the choice anyway.
Most have been thinking about it for years. But post-Dobbs, the abstract became concrete. The "what ifs" transformed into "when."
What if my birth control fails? What if I need an abortion and can't get one? What if the state I live in changes its laws next month? What if my body becomes a political battleground and I lose?
So they're choosing the one option no legislature can reverse once it's done.
Tubal ligation—a surgical procedure where the fallopian tubes are cut, tied, or blocked to prevent eggs from reaching sperm—becomes more than a medical decision. It becomes insurance. Protection. A line drawn in permanent marker that says: this body, this choice, this decision is mine alone.
The studies capture the gender dynamics starkly. Tubal ligations increased twice as much as vasectomies after Dobbs. Even though vasectomies are simpler, cheaper, less invasive, and carry fewer risks.
Women are still shouldering the burden—and the permanent consequences—of reproductive planning.
One study found vasectomies increased by about 27 additional procedures per 100,000 visits, while tubal ligations increased by 58 per 100,000. Among young adults, tubal ligations were 1.29 times higher after Dobbs; vasectomies were 1.59 times higher—but started from a much lower baseline.
Dr. Philip Morgan, one of the researchers at Boston University School of Public Health, noted the disparity: "Within mixed-gender couples, promoting access to male sterilization is one way to begin equalizing the responsibility of reproductive planning."
But that's not happening. The data shows women are choosing permanence at rates far exceeding men.
The geographic patterns reveal how fear transcends state lines. Forty-nine out of fifty states saw increased search interest for both tubal ligation and vasectomy after the Dobbs decision.
South Dakota and Idaho—states with "trigger laws" that banned abortion immediately when Roe fell—saw the greatest surges. But states with protected abortion rights weren't far behind.
Because young women in blue states watched what happened in red states and thought: that could be us next.
The conversation around reproductive rights often centers on abortion access—the ability to end unwanted pregnancies. But these women are illuminating another dimension of reproductive autonomy: the right to prevent pregnancies. The fundamental right to decide if motherhood ever enters your story at all.
For decades, young childfree women faced barriers to sterilization. Doctors questioned their decisions. "You'll change your mind." "You're too young." "What if you meet someone who wants kids?" "What if you regret it?"
Some of those barriers remain. But post-Dobbs, the calculus has shifted. Doctors are listening differently. Women are pushing harder.
And the procedures are happening at unprecedented rates.
Dr. Julia Strasser, director of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health at George Washington University, captured the tension in the data: "While access to all contraceptive methods—including permanent ones—is critical for reproductive autonomy, young people should not feel coerced into making decisions based on fear and uncertainty surrounding their rights."
That's the paradox. These women are making autonomous choices. But they're making them in a context where their autonomy feels threatened. They're choosing freedom through permanence because temporary protections no longer feel reliable.
The studies emphasize that correlation doesn't definitively prove causation. Maybe these increases would have happened anyway. Maybe the slow upward trend in young adult sterilizations just accelerated naturally.
But the timing is unmistakable. The spike happened immediately after Dobbs. It continued month after month. And the women sitting in consultation rooms across America are explicit about their reasoning.
They're not confused. They're not irrational. They're responding to a world where the Supreme Court can eliminate constitutional rights overnight, where state legislatures can criminalize healthcare decisions, where their bodily autonomy is subject to political whims.
So they're taking the one irreversible step available to them.
In clinic after clinic, women in their twenties are reclaiming something they fear might be taken. They're writing their reproductive futures in surgical steel and sutures, creating a certainty that no court can overturn and no legislature can restrict.
This is what reproductive choice looks like in post-Roe America.
Not always the choice advocates imagined fighting for. Not always the outcome policymakers anticipated.
But choice nonetheless. Made with eyes wide open. Made with full knowledge of the consequences. Made by young women who've decided that controlling their fertility permanently is the only control they can trust.
The numbers keep climbing. The appointments keep booking. And America is learning what happens when you tell an entire generation of women that their reproductive rights are negotiable.
They make them non-negotiable. One fallopian tube at a time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
