Thursday, September 24, 2020

ANS -- The American Problem

And here's another one on the same subject, but saying about the opposite.  It's shorter.
From FaceBook, so no link.  
--Kim


Sara Robinson
 and 
Evan Robinson
 shared a post.
One of the peculiar dynamics of the American Problem is that U.S. conservative leaders don't represent or care about cities. They don't care if cities burn or grind to a halt in protest. Big corporations are not clearly aligned behind them. So the pressure levers aren't easy.
You could put millions and millions in the streets, and the rural gerrymandered legislators would laugh. The police don't live in the cities they serve. Wildcat strike? Even if you could, it's not like Apple, Amazon, Starbucks, Yum, Berkshire, etc., are keeping Trump in power. This isn't like 1930s Germany.
Stop paying taxes? These guys are actively letting cities and blue states go bankrupt, and at the federal level they don't care about deficits at all.
You could send tens of millions to Washington DC, and they would all just leave town and wait it out. So if your answer to a Trump coup is "direct action" or whatever, you need to think very carefully about what you mean, what will work and whether they will care.
There are conceivable scenarios in which Republicans could feel enough pressure to step back from the coup, but they generally wouldn't look like the traditional leftist approach to direct action. There is likely no protest, riot or general strike big enough to do it.
But this is also why it's important, when facing a fascist threat, for liberal democracy to have buy-in from a lot of players with power in society, including ones we might not always be comfortable allying with. Stopping the Trump coup may take *all* hands on deck.
P.S. You might recognize the fundamental rural-over-urban totalitarianism problem in another culture/country: Iran. The cities have more population, but are policed by conservative rurals in charge. The young people protest and revolt in numbers, but lack institutional buy-in.

ANS -- Eight things to stop a Coup

Sara Robinson shared this on FaceBook.  It's about what to do if there's a Trump coup after the election.  We have to get this right.  

--Kim


3h
  · 
The most important and useful thing you'll read this week. Keep it where you can find it on November 4. You may need it.
3h
  · 
This is great. Daniel Hunter offers these guidelines:
We have a president who has openly said he might not respect the outcome of our election. We have to be ready if he claims victory before votes are counted, tries to stop counting, or refuses to accept a loss.
Some days I feel confident it will happen. A poll showed over 75 percent of Democrats think this is possible — and a shocking 30 percent of Republicans do too!
Other days I feel confident this is tough talk from a president not good at planning ahead. Still, he is good at the kind of misdirection that can keep us complacent and reactionary — which could lead us to stop doing the important groundwork of getting out the vote, protecting the post office and fighting voter suppression.
So what I'm offering isn't asking us to stop what we're doing now. Instead I'm part of an effort called Choose Democracy, which is prepping people for the possibility of a coup while keeping people focused on a strong, robust election process. After all, the best way to stop a coup is to not have one.
These guidelines are drawn from the wide body of experience and evidence from the many countries that have experienced a coup since World War II. You can read some fuller case studies from Choose Democracy or a longer evidence-based handbook for this moment from "Hold the Line: A Guide to Defending Democracy."
1. Don't expect results election night.
Election season 2020 is shaping up to be very unusual. Many mail-in ballots may not be counted until days or weeks after Election Day. Since Democrats are expected to use them more frequently than Republicans, voter tallies are expected to swing towards Democrats post-election night (they call it a "blue shift"). As a result, a wave of confusion may unfold starting election night.
The strange Electoral College creates multiple intervention points. After election night (Nov. 3), trumped up claims of fraudulent ballots may cause a wayward attorney general or other government officials to try halting counts or excluding ballots.
As election results start coming in the message needs to come through loud and clear: Count all the votes and honor the result.
On Dec. 14, the delegates of the Electoral College meet and vote for the state's outcome. This is typically done without fanfare, but in contested states we might see governors and state legislatures sending in different results — one reflecting the results from voters, the other claiming "it's a fraud" and "we know best." This is worrying in swing states like Pennsylvania, where the governor and state legislature are of different parties.
All these issues then get resolved on Jan. 6 by the new Congress. And if the House and Senate don't agree about the result, then a convoluted process unfolds where the newly seated House — via one state, one-vote — determines the president. Meanwhile, the Senate (by majority) votes for the new vice president. (#ShutDownDC provides a visual break-down of these steps.)
During this time expect false flags and outlandish claims. Be very cautious with news. Don't simply pass on whatever seems like dramatic examples of wrongdoing — but take the time to check if it has been verified, already debunked, or from a source you don't trust. Encourage people in your community to prepare for some uncertain weeks. As election results start coming in the message needs to come through loud and clear: Count all the votes and honor the result.
2. Do call it a coup.
One reason to use the language of a coup is that people know it's wrong and a violation of Democratic norms — even if they're not familiar with the exact definition of a coup.
We have to be ready to declare loudly and strongly: This is a coup.
Language like "election tampering" or "voter suppression" signal deterioration of the democratic process. But if we get ourselves into a coup situation — like where Trump just won't go — we need to help people help our country move into a psychic break.
We know it's a coup if the government:
Stops counting votes;
Declares someone a winner who didn't get the most votes; or
Allows someone to stay in power who didn't win the election.
These are sensible red lines that people can grasp right away (and that the majority of Americans continue to believe in).
People who do power grabs always claim they're doing it to save democracy or claim they know the "real" election results. So this doesn't have to look like a military coup with one leader ordering the opposition to be arrested.
If any of those three principles are violated, we have to declare loudly and strongly: This is a coup.
3. Know that coups have been stopped by regular folks.
Coup attempts have happened all over the world, and over half have failed. That's because coups are hard to orchestrate. They are a violation of norms that require quick seizure of multiple levels of institutions with a claim that they are the rightful heir.
Coups tend to fail when government institutions (like elections) are trusted, there is an active citizenry and other nations are ready to become involved.
The role of citizenry is crucial. That's because during the period right after a coup attempt— when the new government is claiming it is the "real" government — all the institutions have to decide who to listen to.
To start preparing, talk to at least 5 people who would go into the streets with you — the safest way to take to the streets is with people you know and trust.
A failed coup in Germany in 1920 gives an example. The population felt beaten down by defeat in World War I and high unemployment. Right-wing nationalists organized a coup and got the help of a few generals to seize government buildings. The deposed government fled but ordered all citizens to obey them. "No enterprise must work as long as the military dictatorship reigns," they declared.
Widespread nonviolent resistance quickly began. Printers refused to print the new government's newspapers. Civil servants refused to carry out any orders from the coup. And leaflets calling for an end to the coup were spread by airplane and by hand.
There's a story of the coup leader wandering up and down the corridors looking in vain for a secretary to type up his proclamations. The acts of resistance grew and eventually the democratic government (which still had grave problems) was returned to power.
The moments after a coup are moments for heroism amongst the general population. It's how we make democracy real.
4. Be ready to act quickly — and not alone.
Typically power grabs are organized in secret and launched suddenly. Most campaigns that defeat coups do so in days: The Soviet Union in 1991 took three days, France in 1961 took four days and Bolivia in 1978 took 16 days.
It's rare for any country's leader to publicly admit they might not respect the results of an election. There's some good news in that — because people who stop coups rarely have the chance to get training, warning or preparation. In that way, we're ahead of the game.
A group of D.C. insiders called the Transition Integrity Project ran multiple simulations, such as what might happen if Biden wins by a slim margin or if Trump simply declares victory when there's no clear winner. In every simulation they concluded that a "show of numbers in the streets may be decisive." Regular people make the difference.
To start preparing, talk to at least five people who would go into the streets with you — the safest way to take to the streets is with people you know and trust. Talk to people you know in civil service and various roles about how they could non-comply with coup attempts. Use this time to get yourself ready to act.
5. Focus on widely shared democratic values, not on individuals.
In Argentina in 1987, a coup got started when an Air Force major, resenting attempts to democratize the military and bring it under civilian control, organized hundreds of soldiers at his base.
While the civilian government tried to quietly negotiate a settlement, people took to the streets. Against the government's pleading, 500 regular citizens marched to the base with the slogan "Long live democracy! Argentina! Argentina!" They could have spent time attacking the major. Instead, they were appealing to their fellow citizens to choose democracy.
The major tried to keep them away with a tank, but the protesters entered the base anyway, and he knew that open firing on nonviolent civilians would cause him to lose more credibility. Soon 400,000 people took to the streets in Buenos Aires to rally in opposition to the coup.
Coups are not a time to just watch and wait until "someone else" figures it out. No matter who you are you can be a part of choosing democracy.
This gave strength to the civilian government (which had largely been absent). Civic organizations, the Catholic church, business groups and labor unions united under a pledge to "support in all ways possible the constitution, the normal development of the institutions of government and democracy as the only viable way of life." The coup plotters lost their legitimacy and soon surrendered.
This approach is different than protesters going in the street with a list of issues or a grievance against a vilified leader. Instead, it's exalting widely-shared core democratic values. In our project we use the language of "choosing democracy."
This affirms another finding from the research on anti-coups: Because coups are an attack on the current institution, loyalists to the traditional way — who may never join other movement causes — are open to joining actions in the street. That's if we make the invitation about democratic values they can connect with.
6. Convince people not to freeze or just go along.
Imagine that at your job a corrupt boss gets fired and a new one is brought in. Instead of leaving, your old boss says, "I'm still in charge. Do what I say." A bunch of your co-workers say, "We only take orders from the old boss." At that point, doubt arises.
That doubt is how coups succeed. Enough people freeze. Even when only a few people go along with the coup and act as though that's normal, people may reluctantly accept it as inevitable.
In all the research on preventing coups, there's one common theme: People stop doing what the coup plotters tell them to do.
In Germany, from military commanders to secretaries, they refused to obey the orders of the coup. In Mali they called a nationwide strike. In Sudan protesters shut down government-supported radio stations and occupied airport runways. In Venezuela all shops were closed.
This is very different than mass marches at the capital or street protests shutting down intersections. It's not about protest but about getting people to reassert core values — like showing up at elected officials' offices to get them to agree to honor election results. And it's not about single points of actions like marches in D.C. — but instead actions like mass strikes from youth and students refusing to go to work or school until all votes are counted.
Coups are not a time to just watch and wait until "someone else" figures it out. No matter who you are you can be a part of choosing democracy.
7. Commit to actions that represent rule of law, stability and nonviolence.
Stopping a coup is dependent on the size of mobilizations and winning over the center. It is really a fight for legitimacy. Which voice is legitimate? Some people will have already made up their minds. The aim, then, is convincing those who are uncertain — which may be a more surprising number than you expect.
Mass resistance to coups wins by using walk-outs and strikes, refusing orders and shutting down civil society.
To swing them to our side, that uncertain center has to be convinced that "we" represent stability and "the coup plotters" represent hostility to the democratic norms of elections and voting.
We prevent that possibility when we dehumanize potential defectors, make sweeping statements like "the police won't help," never encourage people to join our side and create chaotic scenes on the street.
Historically, whichever side resorts to violence the most tends to lose. In a moment of uncertainty, people pick the side that promises maximum stability, respects democratic norms and appears to be the safer bet. It's a contest of who can be the most legitimate.
Mass resistance to coups wins by using walk-outs and strikes, refusing orders and shutting down civil society until the rightful democratically-elected leader is installed. For mass movements to succeed against coups, they should refuse to do violence to the other side.
8. Yes, a coup can happen in the United States.
It may be hard to imagine that a coup could happen in this country. But whenever there is an order to stop counting votes, we call it a coup.
Even by the strictest definition of coups, there has been a militarized coup in the United States. In 1898 after reconstruction in Wilmington, North Carolina, seeing the rise of a prosperous and successful Black population, white racists organized a coup. They gave rallying cries like, "We will never surrender to a ragged raffle of Negroes, even if we have to choke the Cape Fear River with carcasses."
Despite a terror campaign before the election, Black turnout was high and a slate of Black candidates was voted in. Black power was met with white supremacist violence, with white squads killing 30 to 300 people, including newly elected officials. Over 3,000 Blacks fled this extreme violence, and the era of Jim Crow began.
Thanks to Kenji Liu for sharing this one.

Wednesday, September 23, 2020

ANS -- Conspiracy Theorists Have a Fundamental Cognitive Problem, Say Scientists

This story was originally published in 2017.  It's about how our brains work with respect to conspiracy theories.  and how to cure it.  It's pretty short.  



--Kim





POCKET WORTHYStories to fuel your mind.

Conspiracy Theorists Have a Fundamental Cognitive Problem, Say Scientists

And it can affect all of us.

Inverse
  • Sarah Sloat
GettyImages-562834691crop.jpg

Photo by Oscar Mendoza / EyeEm / Getty Images.

The world's a scary, unpredictable place, and that makes your brain mad. As a predictive organ, the brain is on the constant lookout for patterns that both explain the world and help you thrive in it. That ability helps humans make sense of the world. For example, you probably understand by now that if you see red, that means that you should be on the lookout for danger.

But as scientists report in a 2017 paper published in the European Journal of Social Psychology, sometimes people sense danger even when there is no pattern to recognize — and so their brains create their own. This phenomenon, called illusory pattern perception, they write, is what drives people who believe in conspiracy theories, like climate change deniers, 9/11 truthers, and "Pizzagate" believers.

The study is especially timely; recent polls suggest that nearly 50 percent of ordinary, non-pathological Americans believe in at least one conspiracy theory.

Illusory pattern perception — the act of seeking patterns that aren't there — has been linked to belief in conspiracy theories before, but that assumption has never really been supported with empirical evidence. The British and Dutch scientists behind the new study are some of the first to show that this explanation is, in fact, correct.

The researchers came to this conclusion after conducting five studies on 264 Americans who focused on the relationship between irrational beliefs and illusory pattern perception. Initial studies revealed that the compulsion to find patterns in an observable situation was in fact correlated with irrational beliefs: People who saw patterns in random coin tosses and chaotic, abstract paintings were more likely to believe in conspiratorial and supernatural theories.

The study showed how susceptible people can be to external influences, too. Reading about paranormal or conspiracy beliefs, the researchers report, caused a "slight increase in the perception of patterns in coin tosses, paintings and life," and reading about one conspiracy theory made people more likely to believe in another one.

"Following a manipulation of belief in one conspiracy theory people saw events in the world as more strongly casually connected, which in turn predicted unrelated irrational beliefs," write the authors.

The researchers suggest that irrational beliefs are born from pattern perception because of the "automatic tendency to make sense of the world by identifying meaningful relationships between stimuli." But distortions can happen, and the brain can connect dots that are actually nonexistent. People are bad at judging what's random and believe that, often times, patterns are actually coincidences, which leads to irrational connections between unrelated stimuli. For example, just because societal power is dominated by the rich does not mean those rich people are Illuminati Satanists, though that is a thing that many people believe.

Fortunately, other scientists have found a way to block the pervasiveness of illusory pattern perception: critical thinking. In a previous interview, North Carolina State University psychology professor Anne McLaughlin told Inverse that critical thinking is something that can be taught, and if people are trained in the right way, pseudoscience and false conspiracies can be combated with logic and reasoning. The brain may try to make false connections, but that doesn't mean you have to believe it.




Sarah Sloat is a writer based in Brooklyn. She has previously written for The New Republic, Pacific Standard, and McSweeney's Internet Tendency. She likes cheese especially when paired with a full-bodied joke.